Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in humans, but low mortality, around 10 / 100,000 patients / year. It differs from other cancers by its high rate of cure, as well as a long term survival. Numerous treatment techniques are available and of comparable effectiveness: as a result it must be given importance to the short and long term side effects of these different treatments. Prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants is thus one of the standard techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancers of favorable grades (WHO grade 1-2). In comparison with prostatectomy and RTE, brachytherapy allows low rates of long-term urinary toxicities, and comparable rates of erectile function preservation. With regard to erectile dysfunction, their pathophysiology after irradiation is complex and poorly understood, including damage to the erector apparatus, innervation, vascularization, and of course the level of libido. As an example, the radiotherapy team of the Lyon Sud hospital showed that the delivering a the lowest dose of radiation to the pudendal arteries and to the penile bulb during RTE, leads to erectile preservation rates comparable with those from the literature with nearly 85% of patients with erectile function retained at 2 years . They were also able to retrospectively show that a lower dose to the pudendal arteries correlated with better erectile function during brachytherapy. The brachytherapy procedure requires general anesthesia and endorectal ultrasound, which are optimal conditions for injecting hyaluronic acid between the prostate, rectum, and pudendal arteries. This gesture has shown to induce very few morbidity. They want to demonstrate that the injection of hyaluronic acid during prostate brachytherapy will reduce the radiation dose to the pudendal arteries and penile bulb, and thus improve the rate of preservation of erectile function in selected patients. This randomized phase III study comparing dyserection rates after CT performed with (Arm A) and without (Arm B) injection of HA, in a patient population without erectile dysfunction before treatment.
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in humans with an incidence of about 100 / 100,000 cases / year in Europe, but low mortality, around 10 / 100,000 patients / year. It differs from other cancers by its high rate of cure, as well as a long term survival. Numerous treatment techniques are available and of comparable effectiveness: as a result it must be given importance to the short and long term side effects of these different treatments. Prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants is thus one of the standard techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancers of favorable grades (WHO grade 1-2). The overall survival and survival rates without biochemical recurrence at 5 and 10 years are comparable to those of other techniques such as prostatectomy or external radiotherapy (RTE), exceeding 95%. In comparison with prostatectomy and RTE, brachytherapy allows low rates of long-term urinary toxicities, and comparable rates of erectile function preservation. With regard to erectile dysfunction, their pathophysiology after irradiation is complex and poorly understood, including damage to the erector apparatus, innervation, vascularization, and of course the level of libido. As an example, the radiotherapy team of the Lyon Sud hospital showed that the delivering a the lowest dose of radiation to the pudendal arteries and to the penile bulb during RTE, leads to erectile preservation rates comparable with those from the literature with nearly 85% of patients with erectile function retained at 2 years (18.5% moderate erectile dysfunction at 2 years, for moderate to severe degradation rates usually seen between 30 and 70% after external beam radiotherapy. They were also able to retrospectively show that a lower dose to the pudendal arteries correlated with better erectile function during brachytherapy. The brachytherapy procedure requires general anesthesia and endorectal ultrasound, which are optimal conditions for injecting hyaluronic acid between the prostate, rectum, and pudendal arteries. This gesture has shown to induce very few morbidity. They want to demonstrate that the injection of hyaluronic acid during prostate brachytherapy will reduce the radiation dose to the pudendal arteries and penile bulb, and thus improve the rate of preservation of erectile function in selected patients. This randomized phase III study comparing dyserection rates after CT performed with (Arm A) and without (Arm B) injection of HA, in a patient population without erectile dysfunction before treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
162
Patients included in this arm, will have, before insertion of brachytherapy seeds in the prostate, an injection of hyaluronic acid between the prostate, rectum, and pudendal arteries
Centre Jean François Leclerc
Dijon, France
Radiothérapie, Hôpital A. Michallon, CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, France
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, France
interest of Hyalurocnic injection to protect pudendal arteries during prostate brachytherapy in the preservation of Erectile function at 2years.
The primary endpoints is the comparison between the 2 groups of the proportion of patient with preserved erectile function. The erectile function will be assessed with the variation of IIEF-5 score between pre-treatment evaluation and 2years after treatment evaluation. Erectile function will be considered preserved in the absence of a decrease in the IIEF-5 score by more than 5 points.
Time frame: 2 years
Evolution of erectile function.
comparison between the 2 groups of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5) score evolution during the 2 years of follow-up.
Time frame: 2 years
The IPDE5 consumption at 2 years
The consumption of IPDE5 at 2 years will be defined by the proportion of patients who have used IPDE5 at least once after the intervention.
Time frame: 2 years
Erection satisfaction at 2 years
Erection satisfaction at 2 years will be measured using a numerical scale rated from 0 to 10, 0 being "not at all satisfied" and 10 "completely satisfied
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.