This phase II trial studies how well radiation therapy and cisplatin with or without cetuximab works in treating patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) positive, KRAS-variant stage III-IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, may help the body?s immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving radiation therapy, cisplatin, and cetuximab may work better in treating patients with HPV positive, KRAS-variant oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma compared to radiation therapy and cisplatin alone.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients in terms of overall survival (OS) at 2 years. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of patterns of failure at 6 months and 2 years. II. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years. III. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of locoregional control (LRC) at 2 years. IV. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) at 2 and 5 years. V. To determine the efficacy of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of OS at 5 years. VI. To determine the safety of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of acute toxicity profiles at the end of radiation, at 1 month, and at 6 months. VII. To determine the safety of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of late toxicity profiles at 1 and 2 years. VIII. To determine the safety of radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin combined with concurrent cetuximab in KRAS-variant OPSCC patients in terms of patient-reported swallowing outcomes at 6 months and 1 and 2 years. IX. To assess the predictive value of fludeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) at 10-14 weeks post-treatment. X. To assess the predictive value of additional blood and tissue biomarkers for disease outcomes at 2 years. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the impact of cetuximab on the immune response as well as treatment outcome and toxicity. II. To evaluate biomarkers for immune response in HPV-associated OPSCC through saliva and blood samples to be collected prior to treatment and at each follow-up visit. III. To evaluate for additional checkpoint targets through tumor tissue taken at the time of initial biopsy and profiled for tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, activation markers, and antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) utilization/diversity. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Beginning on day 0, patients undergo radiation therapy over 6 weeks for a total of 35 fractions. Patients also receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) over 1-2 hours on days 0 and 21. ARM II: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 120 minutes 5-7 days prior to start of radiation therapy and then IV over 60 minutes weekly on Monday or Tuesday for 7 weeks. Patients also undergo radiation therapy and receive cisplatin as in Arm I. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2-4 weeks, every 12 weeks for 2 years, and then every 3-12 months for up to 5 years.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1
Given IV
Given IV
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Undergo radiation therapy
UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Overall survival (OS)
OS will be estimated in each study arm by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Summaries of the number and percentage of patients who have died, are still in survival follow-up, are lost to follow-up and have withdrawn consent will be provided along with median OS. Furthermore, a binomial test of proportions will be used to test difference in 2-year OS between the two arms. Exact tests and continuity correction strategies will be considered when appropriate.
Time frame: From time of randomization to death due to any cause, assessed at 2 years
Primary tumor control
Will be determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version (v). 1.1. Kaplan-Meier estimate will be used to describe primary control rate for each arm. Furthermore, log-rank test will be used to test the difference between primary tumor control between the two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Locoregional recurrence rate
Will be determined by surveillance imaging, with failure defined as appearance of new disease in the head and neck from the date of randomization. Kaplan-Meier estimate will be used to describe locoregional recurrence rate for each arm. Furthermore, log-rank test will be used to test difference in locoregional recurrence rates between the two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Acute toxicity
Will be evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. The safety analysis set will be used for safety analyses. The overall safety and tolerability will be assessed throughout the study period. All adverse event (AE) data will be listed individually by treatment group and patient identifier.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Late toxicity
Will be evaluated using the CTCAE v5.0. The safety analysis set will be used for safety analyses. The overall safety and tolerability will be assessed throughout the study period. All AE data will be listed individually by treatment group and patient identifier.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.