To evaluate the safety and performance of the Sundance™ DCB in subjects with occlusive disease of the infrapopliteal arteries.
SWING is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, feasibility study to assess the safety and performance of the Sundance™ drug coated balloon for the treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions in infra-popliteal Arteries. Approximately 35 subjects will be treated at up to 8 sites.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
35
Angioplasty procedure with a sirolimus-coated, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon catheter
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Australia
Prince of Wales Private Hospital
Randwick, Australia
Royal North Shore Hospital
St Leonards, Australia
Universitäts Klinikum Graz
Graz, Austria
Primary Safety Endpoint: Number of Participants with a composite of freedom from Major Adverse Limb Event (MALE) and perioperative death
MALE is defined as the composite of either major amputation or major re-intervention through 30 days of the index procedure. Major amputation is defined as limb amputation above the ankle. Major re-intervention is defined as the creation of new surgical bypass graft, the use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis, or major surgical graft revision such as a jump graft or an interposition graft.
Time frame: 30 Days
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Rate of Late Lumen Loss (LLL)
LLL is assessed by quantitative vascular angiography (QVA). LLL is the difference between minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after PTA and MLD at 6 months follow-up.
Time frame: 6 Months
Rate of Device Success
Successful delivery, balloon inflation, deflation and retrieval of the intact study device
Time frame: Acute/Periprocedural
Rate of Technical Success
Successful vascular access, completion of endovascular procedure and immediate achievement of ≤ 50% residual stenosis (by core lab-assessed quantitative vascular angiography) of the treated lesion on completion of angiography.
Time frame: Acute/Periprocedural
Rate of Procedure Success
Device Success or Technical Success and the absence of procedural complications.
Time frame: Acute/Periprocedural
Rate of Restenosis
Assessed by Transverse-view vessel area loss percentage (TVAL%) assessed by QVA. TVAL% of the target lesion at 6 months or prior to any clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) of the target lesion prior to 6 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, Germany
MEDINOS Kliniken des Landkreises Sonneberg GmbH
Sonneberg, Germany
Paul Stradins University Hospital
Riga, Latvia
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, New Zealand
Time frame: 6 Months or prior
Number of Participants with Primary Patency
Freedom from target vessel occlusion as determined by DUS and CD-TLR. CD-TLR is defined as any TLR of the target lesion associated with deterioration of Rutherford Class and/or increase in size of pre-existing wounds and/or occurrence of new wound(s), and lesion restenosis \>50% determined by angiography.
Time frame: 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months
Major Adverse Event (MAE) rate
Composite rate of all-cause death, target limb major amputation and CD-TLR.
Time frame: 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months
Amputation Free Survival
Rate of subjects not requiring major amputations
Time frame: 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months
Hemodynamic outcomes
Change in ankle brachial index (ABI) and toe pressure from pre-procedure.
Time frame: 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months
Change in Rutherford-Becker Classification
Change from pre-procedure
Time frame: 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months
EQ-5D
The EQ-5D is not an abbreviation. It is a quality of Life evaluation quantified as the change from pre-procedure to time points specified below. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Each level corresponds to 1-digit number expressing the level selected for that dimension. The EQ VAS corresponds to a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale raging from 'the best health you can imagine' to 'the worst health you can imagine'
Time frame: 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)
Walking Capacity Assessment quantified as the change from pre-procedure to time points specified below.The questions characterize patients' self-reported degree of difficulty in walking a defined distance (5, 3, 2, 1, 1/2 city blocks, 50 ft. or around the home) and speed (running/jogging one block, walking one block quickly, walking one block at average speed, or walking one block slowly). These responses are ranked on a scale of 0 to 4, (0=unable to do, 4=no difficulty). Subscale scores are determined by dividing the weighted answers by the maximum possible weighted score and multiplying by 100. Each score ranges from 0-100 with lower scores indicating lower performance. The overall score is the average of all 3 subscores.
Time frame: 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol)
Quality of Life evaluation quantified as the change from pre-procedure to time points specified below. VascuQol is an instrument in which the participant is asked about their concerns, abilities, and activities. Overall values can range from 6 to 24, with a higher total sum representing better participant health.
Time frame: 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months