To determine if low levels of ozone (O3) encountered on a typical day in Chapel Hill will decrease spirometric values in mild asthmatics.
Short-term exposure to ambient air ozone has been recognized for decades to be adversely associated with impacts on the respiratory system. Indeed the evidence is such that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that there is a causal relationship, and even lowered the 8-hour exposure standard to 0.07 parts per million (ppm) in 2015. Controlled human exposure studies and epidemiological studies have consistently observed ozone-associated decrements in lung function and increased respiratory symptoms. Most controlled human exposure studies have been performed with high ozone concentrations. Additionally, epidemiologic studies have focused on populations engaged in outdoor activities (increasing ozone exposure through increased minute ventilation), or in cities such as Los Angeles or Mexico City where ambient ozone levels are especially high. Evidence has recently emerged that exposure to low ozone concentrations also produces adverse health effects, especially among susceptible groups including children with asthma. The objective of this study is to examine if low level ozone exposure (compared to a clean air exposure), reflective of a typical metropolitan summer day, will cause decrements in lung function and measurable upper and lower airway inflammation in mild asthmatics (who are not on asthma controller medications) while performing typical daily activities.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
18
University of North Carolina CEMALB
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Change in Percent (%) predicted forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1)
Change from baseline %predicted FEV1 post-O3 versus post-air exposure.
Time frame: 6 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure versus pre-exposure
Change in Percent (%) predicted forced vital capacity (FVC)
Change from baseline %predicted FVC post-O3 versus post-air exposure.
Time frame: 6 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure versus pre-exposure
Change in Percent eosinophils in induced sputum
% eosinophils in induced sputum (24 hrs post ozone - post air)
Time frame: 24 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure
Change in Percent (%) neutrophils in induced sputum
% neutrophils in induced sputum (24 hrs post ozone - post air)
Time frame: 24 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure
Change in Eosinophils per mg of induced sputum
Eosinophils per mg of induced sputum (24 hrs post ozone - post air)
Time frame: 24 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure
Change in neutrophils per mg of induced sputum
Neutrophils per mg of induced sputum (24 hrs post ozone - post air)
Time frame: 24 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure
Change in Cytokine concentrations in induced sputum picograms per milliliter (pg/mL)
Cytokine and via Mesoscale in induced sputum (pg/mL)
Time frame: 24 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Change in Cytokine concentrations in Nasal Epithelial Lining Fluid (NELF)
Cytokine via Mesoscale in NELF
Time frame: 6 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure
Change in Change in cytokine concentrations in Nasal Epithelial Lining Fluid (NELF)
Cytokine and via Mesoscale in NELF
Time frame: 24 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure
Change in Fraction of Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) levels in parts per billion (PPB)
Changes in FeNO levels in ppb (6 hours post ozone - post air)
Time frame: 6 post-O3 post-air exposure versus pre-exposure
Change in FENO levels in parts per billion (PPB)
Changes in FeNO levels in ppb (24 hours post ozone - post air)
Time frame: 24 hours post-O3 versus post-air exposure