The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal dose of S-600918 in patients with refractory chronic cough by evaluating the change from baseline in 24-hour cough frequency (coughs per hour) with S-600918 compared with placebo.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
406
Tablets for oral administration
Tablets for oral administration
Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour in 24 Hours Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment
Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the log-transformed coughs per hour in 24 hours at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Number of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment
The number of coughs per hour for 24 hours was measured using a cough monitor.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment
Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour while awake at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participants as random effect, and region and the log-transformed coughs per hour while awake at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Number of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment
The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Research Solutions of Arizona
Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States
Pulmonary Associates, PA
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Alliance for Multispecialty Research
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Southern California Institute For Respiratory Diseases, Inc.
Los Angeles, California, United States
Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California dba Southern California Research
Mission Viejo, California, United States
California Medical Research Associates, Inc.
Northridge, California, United States
Center for Clinical Trials, LLC
Paramount, California, United States
Institute of HealthCare Assessment, Inc.
San Diego, California, United States
Sher Allergy Specialist/Center for Cough
Largo, Florida, United States
Medical Research Of Central Florida, LLC
Leesburg, Florida, United States
...and 126 more locations
Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Asleep Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment
Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour while asleep at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participants as random effect, and region and the log-transformed coughs per hour while asleep at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Change From Baseline in Weekly Cough Severity Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment
Cough severity was assessed by the participant by a visual analog scale with numbers from 0 to 100. Results are presented as change from baseline. Reported change is based on a mixed model for the change in weekly cough severity score after 4 weeks of treatment with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the severity score at baseline as covariates. Higher scores indicated higher cough severity.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score
The LCQ is a patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measure of chronic cough. The questionnaire consists of 19 items to which the participant responds on a 7-point Likert response scale (from 1 to 7). Each item assesses symptoms during cough and the effect of cough on 3 main domains: physical, psychological and social. Domain scores range from 1-7, and the total score ranges from 3 - 21. Higher score indicates a better quality of life. Results are presented as change from baseline. Reported change is based on a mixed model for the change in LCQ Total Score after 4 weeks of treatment with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the LCQ Score of corresponding domain at baseline as covariates.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Number of Responders Defined as Participants With an Increase in LCQ of ≥ 1.3 Points
The LCQ is a patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measure of chronic cough. The questionnaire consists of 19 items to which the participant responds on a 7-point Likert response scale (from 1 to 7). Each item assesses symptoms during cough and the effect of cough on 3 main domains: physical, psychological and social. Domain scores range from 1-7, and the total score ranges from 3 - 2. A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Change From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
The ICIQ-SF is a questionnaire used to evaluate the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life. The questionnaire includes 3 items with responses measured on Likert scales, and 1 item that is measured via a qualitative response. The 3 nominal responses are summed to give the ICIQ score (this total ICIQ-SF score can range from 0 to 21), where a higher score indicates more severe symptoms. The 1 item remaining that is measured via qualitative response is not given a score; rather, the participant selects 1 description out of 8 possible descriptions of this item.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)
The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire to assesses a participant's health status using 8 health concepts: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions. The mental component reports the average of all the emotionally relevant items and the physical component reports the average of all the physically relevant items. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 indicates no disability. Median change can range from -100 to 100. A positive median change indicates an improved outcome.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Number of Responders as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of overall health status and consists of 1 item adapted from the Clinical Global Impressions scale. The participant selects 1 description out of 7 possible descriptions of this item. The descriptions are numbered from 1 through 7, where lower numbers indicate better quality of life. Participants were considered responders if they reported "Very much improved", "Much improved", or "Minimally improved" from baseline on the PGIC assessment.
Time frame: Week 4