The aim of this randomized, crossover clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of a gut microbiota-targeted nutritional intervention containing a blend of fermentable fibers and polyphenols (FP) for mitigating increases in GI permeability, and decrements in immune function and neuropsychologic performance following rapid ascent to simulated high altitude. Fifteen healthy young adults will participate in each of three study phases that include a 14-day supplementation period in which participants will consume 1 of 2 supplement bars: placebo (PL, will be consumed during 2 phases) and FP supplementation (will be consumed during one phase only). During the final 2-d of each phase, participants will live in a hypobaric chamber under sea level or high altitude conditions.
The collection of microbes inhabiting the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract, known as the gut microbiota, is increasingly recognized as a mediator of GI, immunologic, and neuropsychologic responses to various environmental and physiologic stressors. The hypobaric hypoxia characteristic of high altitude environments is a stressor that has recently been associated with increased GI permeability, and which has been shown to cause decrements in immune, neuropsychological and physical function. To what extent modulation of the human gut microbiota can mitigate these responses during high altitude exposure is undetermined. The aim of this randomized, crossover clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of a gut microbiota-targeted nutritional intervention containing a blend of fermentable fibers and polyphenols (FP) for mitigating increases in GI permeability, and decrements in immune function and neuropsychologic performance following rapid ascent to simulated high altitude. Fifteen healthy young adults will participate in each of three study phases in random order. Each phase will include a 14-day supplementation period in which participants will consume 1 of 2 supplement bars: placebo (PL, will be consumed during 2 phases) and FP supplementation (will be consumed during one phase only). During the final 2-d of each phase, participants will live in a hypobaric chamber. During one phase the chamber environment will mimic low-altitude conditions (SHAM). During two phases the chamber environment will mimic the barometric pressure at Pike's Peak CO (460 mmHg; HA).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
33
Fiber and polyphenol blend
Matched placebo
Simulated high altitude in altitude chamber using hypobaric hypoxia
Sea level environment in altitude chamber
USARIEM
Natick, Massachusetts, United States
Difference in intestinal permeability
Intestinal permeability measured by the ratio of the urinary excretion of sucralose and erythrirol
Time frame: Study days 20, 40 and 60
Difference in lipopolysaccharide binding protein concentrations
Fasting serum lipopolysaccharide binding protein concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in zonulin concentrations
Fasting serum zonulin concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in glucagon-like peptide-2 concentrations
Fasting serum glucagon-like peptide-2 concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in intestinal fatty acid binding protein concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum intestinal fatty acid binding protein concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in claudin-3 concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum claudin-3 concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in S100B concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum S100B concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in systemic inflammation
Fasting serum interleukin (IL) IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-1β, IL-1ra, tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ concentrations
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in intestinal inflammation
Fecal calprotectin concentration
Time frame: Study days 6, 18, 21, 23, 27, 39, 42, 44, 48, 60, 63, 65
Difference in glucose concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum glucose concentrations
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in insulin concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum insulin concentrations
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in lactate concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum lactate concentrations
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in glycerol concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum glycerol concentrations
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in cortisol concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise serum cortisol concentrations
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in bone specific alkaline phosphatase concentrations
Fasting serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 41, 62
Difference in carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks concentrations
Fasting serum carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 41, 62
Difference in tartrate resistant acid phosphatase concentrations
Fasting serum tartrate resistant acid phosphatase concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 41, 62
Difference in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide concentrations
Fasting serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 41, 62
Difference in osteocalcin concentrations
Fasting serum osteocalcin concentration
Time frame: Study days 20, 41, 62
Difference in secretory immunoglobulin A concentrations
Secretory immunoglobulin A concentrations in tear fluid and saliva
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in immune cell phenotypes
Immune cell phenotype by flow cytometry
Time frame: Study days 21, 42, 63
Difference in T-cell simulated cytokine production
T-cell simulated cytokine production by cell culture and flow cytometry
Time frame: Study days 21, 42, 63
Difference in natural killer-cell cytotoxicity
Natural killer-cell cytotoxicity by cell culture and flow cytometry
Time frame: Study days 21, 42, 63
Difference in development of acute mountain sickness
Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire-short form. Acute Mountain Sickness will be measured multiple times daily using the Lake Louise scoring system wherein higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. AMS severity cutoffs will use mild (0.7-1.53), moderate (1.53-2.63), severe \>=2.63
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in gastrointestinal symptoms; quality of life
Gastrointestinal symptoms measure by modified version of the gastrointestinal quality of life index wherein lower scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Study weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Difference in gastrointestinal symptoms; irritable bowel syndrome
Gastrointestinal symptoms measure by modified version of the irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity scale score wherein higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Scored on scale of 0-500; symptom severity scored as mild (75-174), moderate (175-300), severe (\>300).
Time frame: Study weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Difference in appetite
Hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective consumption measured by 100 mm visual analog scale. Scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater sensation.
Time frame: Study weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Difference in changes in mood state
Measured by Profile of Mood States Questionnaire; a 65-item inventory of self-reported mood states which factor into six mood sub-scales (tension/anxiety (0-36), depression/dejection (0-60), anger/hostility (0-48), vigor/activity (0-32), fatigue/inertia (0-28), confusion/bewilderment (0-28), and total mood disturbance (0-200) wherein higher scores indicate greater mood state.
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in changes in feeling
Measured by Feeling Scale; a one-item inventory measuring the extent to which participants feel pleasant or unpleasant. Higher scores indicate more unpleasant feeling. Scored from -5 (very bad) to 5 (very good)
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in changes arousal
Measured by Felt Arousal Scale; a one-item inventory measuring the extent to which participants feel aroused. Higher scores indicate greater arousal (low=1 to high =6).
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in willingness to take risks
Measured by Evaluation of Risks Questionnaire; a 24-item questionnaire providing scores on five scales: self-control, danger seeking, energy, impulsivity, and invincibility.
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in risk taking behavior
Measured by Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Time frame: Study days 7, 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in resting metabolic rate
Resting metabolic rate measured by indirect calorimetry
Time frame: Study days 7, 21, 42, 63
Difference in physical activity energy expenditure
Energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry during 60-minute steady state exercise
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in gastrointestinal transit time
Gastric, small intestine and large intestine transit time measured by SmartPill
Time frame: Study days 20, 41, 62
Difference in gastrointestinal pH
Gastric, small intestine and large intestine pH measured by SmartPill
Time frame: Study days 20, 41, 62
Difference in changes in working memory
Measured by N-Back task before, during and after exercise
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in changes in spatial working memory
Measured by emotional Interference task before, during and after exercise
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in changes in spatial memory
Measured by Matching to Sample test in the morning and afternoon
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in change in reaction time
Measured by reaction time task before, during and after exercise
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in change in response inhibition
Measured by Go/No-Go task before, during and after exercise
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
Difference in vigilance
Measured by scanning visual vigilance task
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 23, 41, 42, 44, 62, 63, 65
Difference in simple visual reaction time
Measured by psychomotor vigilance test
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 23, 41, 42, 44, 62, 63, 65
Difference in language-based logical reasoning
Measured by grammatical Reasoning task
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 23, 41, 42, 44, 62, 63, 65
Difference in ambulatory vigilance
Measured by wrist-worn vigilance monitor
Time frame: 48-hours/day during study weeks 0, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9
Difference in fecal short chain fatty acids
Fecal short chain fatty acid concentrations
Time frame: Study days 6, 18, 21, 23, 27, 39, 42, 44, 48, 60, 63, 65
Difference in gut microbiota composition
Fecal bacterial community diversity and relative abundance measured by 16S rRNA gene sequencing
Time frame: Study days 6, 18, 21, 23, 27, 39, 42, 44, 48, 60, 63, 65
Differences in microRNA concentrations
Fasting and post-exercise circulating and exosomal microRNA
Time frame: Study days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.