A considerable number of potential cDCD donors do not convert into actual organ donors because circulatory arrest does not occur within the predefined timeframe of warm ischemia after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The main objective of this study is to determine parameters predicting time to death in potential cDCD patients.
Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a major source of organs for transplantation. Even though there is a well-established cDCD program in the Netherlands, there is still a considerable number of potential donors not being converted into actual organ donors. A potential cDCD donor poses considerable challenges in terms of a) identification of those dying within the predefined timeframe of warm ischemia, after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to circulatory arrest, b) managing them appropriately within the framework and resources of the intensive care unit, c) dealing with family expectations especially when failure to donation occurs, and d) efficient utilization of the organ procurement teams. Factors associated with early circulatory collapse after treatment withdrawal include a younger age, non-triggered modes of artificial ventilation, high FiO2, the use of inotropes, and a low arterial pH. Another important factor which could influence the donor potential is end-of-life treatment. The practice of withdrawal of life support treatment (WLST) is highly variable between ICU's and countries. This influences the dying process and can thus have a large influence on the onset of cardio respiratory arrest. There is also wide variation in the use and dosage of additional sedation and analgesia during WLST and controversy exists regarding hastening or slowing down death. Several attempts have been made to develop models to predict the time between treatment withdrawal and circulatory arrest, as this is crucial to a) proceed with organ donation, and b) the quality of the harvested organs. The selected patients however, where not always restricted to potential candidates for cDCD organ donation as patients with cancer and severe infection were also included. Objective: Objectives of this study are: a) To determine parameters predicting time to death in potential cDCD patients b) To validate and update previous predicting models on time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. c) To assess variation in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the Netherlands and its influence on post mortal organ donor potential and actual post mortal organ donors. Design and setting: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study of all potential cDCD patients of 3 university and 3 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands with diverse focus of attention Methods: All potential cDCD patients participating in the cDCD protocol as defined by the Dutch Transplant Foundation admitted at the Intensive Care unit, will be included. Participants: Mechanically ventilated ICU patients aged between 18 to 75 years. Brain dead patients will be excluded.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
400
Jeroen Bosch Hospital
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Duration (in minutes) on time to circulatory death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, in cDCD patients
Development of a prediction tool to detect time to circulatory death (in minutes) in controlled donation after circulatory death patients (cDCD)
Time frame: 36 months
Incidence of circulatory death in 60 minutes
Number of patients with circulatory death within 60 minutes
Time frame: 36 months
Incidence of circulatory death in 120 and 180 minutes
Number of patients when circulatory death occurs within the timeframe of 120 and 180 minutes
Time frame: 36 months
Doses analgesia
Doses analgesia provided before and during withdrawal of life support in milligrams per hour
Time frame: 36 months
Doses sedation
Doses sedation provided before and during withdrawal of life support in milligrams per hour
Time frame: 36 months
Incidence of withdrawal of endotracheal tube
Number of endotracheal tubes removed
Time frame: 36 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
ETZ
Tilburg, Netherlands
Isala clinics
Zwolle, Netherlands