This study compares a volume targeted pressure support non-invasive ventilation with an automatic PEP regulation (AVAPS-AE mode) to a pressure support non-invasive ventilation (S/T mode) in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis. This study focuses on patients at risk of obstructive apneas or obesity-hypoventilation syndrom (BMI≥30 kg/m²). Half of participants (33 patients) will receive non invasive ventilation with AVAPS-AE mode, the other half will receive non-invasive ventilation with S/T mode.
So far, in respiratory intensive care units, the usual treatment of patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis is non-invasive ventilation set with a pressure support mode (S/T or VS/AI mode depending on the ventilator manufacturer). AVAPS-AE mode is a volume targeted pressure support mode with an automatic PEP. With the forced oscillations method, the ventilator is able to detect the obstruction and the resistances of upper airways. It allows the ventilator to change its pressure settings to keep the targeted volume and avoid apneas and hypoventilation. That is why in patients with a BMI \> 30 kg/m², at risk of obesity hypoventilation syndrom or obstructive apneas, this ventilation mode may be interesting. AVAPS-AE has been evaluated in the home ventilation showing it is as efficient as S/T mode in controlling PaCO2. However it has never been compared to S/T mode in acute respiratory failure care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
14
NIV will be setup in AVAPS-AE mode, with a Trilogy ventilation device (Respironics, Murrysville, PA). The range of positive expiratory pressure will be set between 4 and 14 cmH2O. The range of inspiratory pressure support will be set between 14 and 24 cmH2. The target tidal volume will be set to achieve 8 to 10 mL/kg of ideal body weight (Size (m) \* Size (m) \* 23).
NIV will be setup in ST mode, with a Trilogy ventilation device (Respironics, Murrysville, PA). The physician will decide the level of positive expiratory pressure and of pressure support.
CHU Rouen
Rouen, France
Resolution of hypercapnia
Time between admission and resolution of hypercapnia (≤ 6.5 kPa)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of persistent apneic events on NIV (/h) during the first night
Comparison of persistent apneic events on NIV (/h) during the first night (determined with a respiratory polygraph) between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with an oxymeter)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchronisms during NIV (/h)
Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchronisms during NIV (/h) between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with ventilator datas and a respiratory polygraph)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of time during NIV with a oxygen saturation below 90%
Comparison of time during NIV with a oxygen saturation below 90% between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (determined with an oxymeter)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of NIV confort
Comparison of NIV confort between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm (NIV confort determined by a visual scale: 0: very comfortable to 10:not comfortable at all)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of length of stay
Comparison of length of stay between S/T mode arm and AVAPS-AE mode arm
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.