The investigational medicinal product (IMP), INM004, proposes to neutralize the toxin in the bloodstream to prevent the interaction of the Stx with the specific receptor, by means of a polyclonal antibody to be administered upon the appearance of symptoms (bloody diarrhea) and diagnosis of infection by STEC, thereby preventing the action of the toxin in the body. Thus, the initial hypothesis for examination is for the prevention of the full expression of HUS, based upon presumptive clinical, biochemical, and other biological evidence suggesting a risk of HUS at the time of treatment application. The polyclonal antibody (F(ab')2 fragment) is obtained by processing the serum of equine animals previously immunized against engineered Stx1B and Stx2B immunogens. INM004 could be administered at the earlier stages of STEC disease since subjects with STEC diarrhea are more likely to benefit from Stx neutralizing antibodies before the development of extra-intestinal manifestations and HUS. Neutralizing equine anti-Stx F(ab')2 antibodies (INM004) have the objective of preventing the development of HUS by blocking the circulating toxins in patients infected with STEC. Therefore, INM004 may be used in patients with a clinical manifestation of bloody diarrhea and a positive Stx result in feces. Early interruption of the Stx mediated cascade is expected to prevent the development of HUS, alleviate the severity of the illness, the rate of complications and the incidence/duration of hospitalizations. Therefore, patients in the early phases of the disease will be targeted in this study, ie, children who seek medical care due to diarrhea associated with STEC infection before HUS development.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy, characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal impairment of varying severity, which may be preceded by an episode of diarrhea with or without blood. Karmali et al. showed the relationship between this syndrome and diarrhea caused by Shiga toxin-producing bacteria such as Escherichia coli. These cytotoxins, called Shiga-like toxins or Shiga toxins (Stx), are also called verotoxins, due to the characteristic cytopathic effect they cause on Vero cell cultures. HUS is often classified into 3 primary types: 1) HUS due to infections associated with Shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC) or Shigella dysenteriae Type 1, often associated with diarrhea, with the rare exception of HUS due to a severe disseminated infection caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, 2) HUS related to complement abnormalities or related to factor ADAMTS13 deficit, such HUS is also known as "atypical HUS" and is not associated with diarrhea, and 3) HUS of unknown etiology that usually occurs in the course of systemic diseases or physio-pathologic conditions such as pregnancy, after transplantation or after drug use. E. coli bacteria normally live in the intestines of people and animals. Cattle and sheep are the main reservoirs of STEC, and the major transmission route is believed to be food contaminated with animal feces. Contaminated water has also been recognized as a source, and direct human-to-human and animal-to-human transmission have been reported. E. coli consists of a diverse group of bacteria. Most of them are harmless and an important part of a healthy human intestinal tract. However, some E. coli are pathogenic, that can cause either diarrhea or illness outside of the intestinal tract. Diarrheagenic E. coli strains are categorized into 6 pathotypes: 1) Enterotoxigenic E. coli, 2) Enteropathogenic E. coli, 3) Enteroaggregative E. coli, 4) Enteroinvasive E. coli, 5) diffusely adherent E. coli, and 6) STEC. STEC may also be referred to as verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC). This last pathotype is the one most commonly associated with foodborne outbreaks. Treatment of STEC HUS renal damage caused by Stx is available. The investigational medicinal product (IMP), INM004, proposes to neutralize the toxin in the bloodstream to prevent the interaction of the Stx with the specific receptor, by means of a polyclonal antibody to be administered upon the appearance of symptoms (bloody diarrhea) and diagnosis of infection by STEC, thereby preventing the action of the toxin in the body. Thus, the initial hypothesis for examination is for the prevention of the full expression of HUS, based upon presumptive clinical, biochemical, and other biological evidence suggesting a risk of HUS at the time of treatment application. The polyclonal antibody (F(ab')2 fragment) is obtained by processing the serum of equine animals previously immunized against engineered Stx1B and Stx2B immunogens. INM004 could be administered at the earlier stages of STEC disease since subjects with STEC diarrhea are more likely to benefit from Stx neutralizing antibodies before the development of extra-intestinal manifestations and HUS. Neutralizing equine anti-Stx F(ab')2 antibodies (INM004) have the objective of preventing the development of HUS by blocking the circulating toxins in patients infected with STEC. Therefore, INM004 may be used in patients with a clinical manifestation of bloody diarrhea and a positive Stx result in feces. Early interruption of the Stx mediated cascade is expected to prevent the development of HUS, alleviate the severity of the illness, the rate of complications and the incidence/duration of hospitalizations. Therefore, patients in the early phases of the disease will be targeted in this study, ie, children who seek medical care due to diarrhea associated with STEC infection before HUS development. Pediatric subjects between 1 and 10 years (y) of age at the time of screening with an increased risk for development of HUS defined by the presence of bloody diarrhea based upon history or presentation and positive screen for Stx2 in the stool will be enrolled. Bloody diarrhea and positive screen for Stx2 have been included as inclusion criteria as these factors have been identified as risk factor for HUS development and will serve to enrich the patient population within the study to those most likely to benefit from this therapy. Case of Bloody Diarrhea Any person with an increase in the number of daily stools and alteration in the stool consistency, with presence of visible blood, which may include episodes of stool formed with blood in the form of streaks on its surface or blood visible only under a microscope, which may be accompanied by other symptoms such as vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain, or fever. Case of Shiga Toxin producing Escherichia coli Infection Identification of the etiological agent by at least 1 of the following laboratory criteria: * Isolation of an E. coli strain that produces Stx or harbors stx1 or stx2 gene(s); * Direct detection of stx1 or stx2 gene(s) nucleic acid (without strain isolation); * Direct detection of free Stx in feces (without strain isolation). The surveillance of the STEC strains is performed using subtyping techniques: 1) genotyping of stx and eae by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism and 2) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. STEC O157 and non O157 strains are recovered from the clinic, animal, food and environmental samples, and E. coli O157:H7, a Stx2a/Stx2c producer, harboring eae and ehxA genes, is the most common serotype. Case of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Patient of any age who presents in an acute form with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal compromise. Case of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome with Confirmed Diagnosis of Shiga Toxin producing Escherichia coli Case of HUS with identification of the etiological agent by at least 1 of the laboratory criteria: * Screening of stx1 and/or stx2 by PCR/isolation of STEC * Detection of free Stx in stool * Detection of serogroup-specific O antigen antibodies O157, O145, O121
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
11
The IMP dose to be studied will be 4 mg of protein/kg of subject's weight. Each vial contains 25 mg protein/mL. Therefore, each subject must receive 0.16 mL/kg. The IMP will be added to the 100 mL infusion bag of saline solution. Doses will be administered as an infusion at 2.0 mL/min over 50 min with an interval of 24 h between doses.
The IMP dose to be studied will be 4 mg of protein/kg of subject's weight. Each vial contains 25 mg protein/mL. Therefore, each subject must receive 0.16 mL/kg. The IMP will be added to the 100 mL infusion bag of saline solution. Doses will be administered as an infusion at 2.0 mL/min over 50 min with an interval of 24 h between doses.
Hospital Penna
Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Hospital Sor Maria Ludovica
La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Hospital Lucio Molas
Santa Rosa, La Pampa Province, Argentina
Hospital Castro Rendon
Neuquén, Neuquén Province, Argentina
Hospital Elizalde
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Argentina
Hospital Orlando Alassia
Santa Fe, Argentina
Incidence of HUS development
The primary endpoint is a binary (Y/N) endpoint defined as having confirmed HUS by week 4. This endpoint will be centrally adjudicated by a Clinical Endpoint Committee. This committee will classify all potential events into one of the following categories: * Confirmed HUS * Probable HUS * No HUS The proportion of children with HUS by week 4 confirmed by central adjudication will be reported for each treatment arm (optimal dose of INM004 vs placebo).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Frequency of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) to assess the safety of 2 doses of INM004 in children through evaluation of safety data in Stage 1
Frequency of subjects with TEAEs will be summarized by treatment group providing the number of subjects with event, the proportion subjects with event and the number of events The statistics above will also be provided for the following events: * Serious TEAEs * TEAEs leading to study withdrawal * Treatment related TEAEs * Serious and treatment related TEAEs * Severe TEAEs * TEAEs leading to death * treatment emergent adverse events of special interest (TEAESI) * treatment-emergent adverse events related to background disease (TEAEBD) The frequency of TEAEs will also be reported by System Organ Class (SOC), and will also be reported by severity and relationship to study drug. AEs will be coded by Preferred Term (PT) using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification
Time frame: 12 weeks
Frequency of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) to assess the safety of the administration on INM004 in all treated patients
Frequency of subjects with TEAEs will be summarized by treatment group providing the number of subjects with event, the proportion subjects with event and the number of events The statistics above will also be provided for the following events: * Serious TEAEs * TEAEs leading to study withdrawal * Treatment related TEAEs * Serious and treatment related TEAEs * Severe TEAEs * TEAEs leading to death * treatment emergent adverse events of special interest (TEAESI) * treatment-emergent adverse events related to background disease (TEAEBD) The frequency of TEAEs will also be reported by System Organ Class (SOC), and will also be reported by severity and relationship to study drug. AEs will be coded by Preferred Term (PT) using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification
Time frame: 12 weeks
Incidence of secondary endpoints through Week 4 and Week 12 (short term complications).
* the time to death will be calculated in order to assess overall survival, * The time to the first serious extrarenal events will be calculated (in days) for the following events: * Major neurological involvement * Cardiovascular involvement * Gastrointestinal involvement * Pancreatic involvement * Hepatic involvement
Time frame: by Week 4; by Week 12
Incidence in long-term sequelae from Week 12 through Week 48 in those who develop HUS (long-term complications).
The time to long-term sequelae will be calculated for the following events: * Long-term renal sequelae * Neurological sequelae * Cardiovascular sequelae * Pancreatic sequelae * Gastrointestinal sequelae * Overall survival
Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 48
Time after the administration of INM004 in which peak plasma concentration is reached (Tmax)
Pharmacokinetic profile will be assessed by measuring serum INM004 concentration at different timepoints. Serum INM004 concentration will be followed by a specific ELISA. Concentration of INM004 will be plotted as a function of time and pharmacokinetic profile will be defined.
Time frame: 5 days
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of INM004
Pharmacokinetic profile will be assessed by measuring serum INM004 concentration at different timepoints. Serum INM004 concentration will be followed by a specific ELISA. Concentration of INM004 will be plotted as a function of time and pharmacokinetic profile will be defined.
Time frame: 5 days
Area under the plasma concentration of INM004 versus time curve (AUC)
Pharmacokinetic profile will be assessed by measuring serum INM004 concentration at different timepoints. Serum INM004 concentration will be followed by a specific ELISA. Concentration of INM004 will be plotted as a function of time and pharmacokinetic profile will be defined.
Time frame: 5 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.