Adenomyosis is a disease where ectopic endometrial glands affect the muscular wall of the uterus. Women that suffer from dysmenorrhea or infertility caused by adenomyosis need to confirm or rule out adenomyosis, and therefore tools for non-histologic confirmation of adenomyosis are indubitably required. Transvaginal ultrasound has been shown to be useful in diagnosing adenomyosis, but the interpretation of findings requires significant expertise in ultrasound and experience with diagnosing adenomyosis. This is because adenomyosis shows a very heterogeneous appearance in ultrasound. There are many different diagnostic signs that have to be considered and weighed. In a previous study, the investigators have developed a diagnostic algorithm that helps clinicians diagnose adenomyosis with transvaginal ultrasound and a clinical examination. It showed good diagnostic accuracy and seemed to be very robust with regards to artifacts and experience of the examiner. It is now necessary to validate this prediction model in a new, prospective study so it can be used in clinical practice.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
Turku University Hospital
Turku, Finland
Akershus University Hospital, Dept. of gynecology
Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway
St. Olavs Hospital, Dept. of Gynecology
Trondheim, Trøndelag, Norway
Sykehuset i Vestfold
Tønsberg, Vestfold, Norway
Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål and Rikshospital
Oslo, Norway
Diagnostic accuracy of the prediction model for adenomyosis
Diagnostic accuracy will be described using sensitivity (in %), specificity (in %), positive predictive value (in %), negative predictive value (in %), positive likelihood ratio (calculated by sensitivity/1-specificity), negative likelihood ratio (calculated as 1-sensitivity/specificity) and the area under the receiver-operator curve (as calculated with the (0-1) of the model.
Time frame: 1 year
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between readers
ICC values are categorized as follows: 0-0.20, slight agreement; 0.21-0.40, fair agreement; 0.41-0.60, moderate agreement; 0.61-0.80, substantial agreement; and 0.81-1, almost perfect agreement
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.