Introduction: The current evidence on the efficacy of Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement (ALBC) in reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary joint reconstruction is insufficient. In several European countries, the use of ALBC is routine practice unlike in the US where ALBC use is not approved in low-risk patients. It has been claimed that the antibiotic in ALBC increase the risk of aseptic loosening, risk of systemic toxicity, allergic reaction, and bacterial resistance. Therefore we designed a double-blinded (patients and data analysts) pragmatic multicenter register-based randomized controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate the effects of ALBC compared to plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods and analysis: A minimum of 9,172 patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA will be recruited and equally randomized into the ALBC group and the plain bone cement group. This trial will be conducted in Norwegian hospitals that routinely perform cemented primary TKA. . The primary outcome will be risk of revision surgery due to PJI at 1-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be: * risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up; * patient related outcome measures (PROMs) like function, pain, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life at 1-, 6-, and 10-years of follow-up; * risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up; and * cost-effectiveness of routine ALBC vs plain bone cement use in primary TKA. We will use 1:1 randomization with random permuted blocks and stratify by participating hospitals to randomize patients to receive ALBC or plain bone cement. Inclusion, randomization, and follow-up will be through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the Western Norway Regional Committees on Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK-Vest) (reference number: 2019/751/REK vest) dated: 21.06.2019. The trial results will be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension (CONSORT Extension) reporting guideline 2010 statement for non-inferiority trials. The trial results will be reported to the public through national and international scientific conferences, participating hospitals, patient organizations, and peer-reviewed journals. Discussion: If we find that plain bone cement is non-inferior to the ALBC, it will challenge the routine use of ALBC in primary arthroplasty, due to ecological concerns and costs. However, if routine use of ALBC is associated with a reduced risk of PJI and with minor impact on bacterial resistance, PROMs, and costs, the well-established use of prophylactic ALBC in primary arthroplasty will be supported
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
9,172
The patients undergoing full-cemented primary total knee arthroplasty are allocated to either ALBC or plain bone cement and compare the effectiveness of ALBC use vs pain bone cement bone cement without antibiotic) with respect to revision due to PJI one year after primary TKA surgery.
Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
RECRUITINGrisk of revision due to PJI
Time frame: 1-year follow-up
risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening
Time frame: 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions
Time frame: 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baseline function (in activity of daily life) on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).
Time frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baselinein in Visual Analog Sale (the scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst possible state and 100 indicating the best possible state) for pain.
Time frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baseline in EQ-5D-5L for health related quality of life(HRQoL).
Time frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Mean scores in Visual Analog Sale ( the scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst possible state and 100 indicating the best possible state) for patient satisfaction.
Time frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.