The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of darolutamide as part of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with a luteinising hormone releasing hormone analogue (LHRHA) in men having radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer at very high risk of recurrence.
This trial aims to demonstrate that the use of darolutamide (in addition to standard of care) will be more effective than current standard of care in enhancing the ability of prostate or prostate bed radiation and 96 weeks of androgen suppression in decreasing the number of patients who develop metastases and subsequently die of prostate cancer. Darolutamide is a novel antagonist of the AR with favourable tolerability due to negligible penetration of the blood-brain barrier. Emergence of metastatic disease is the lethal event after local therapy, either with prostatectomy or definitive radiation. Augmenting adjuvant systemic therapy (either ADT or ADT plus docetaxel) with darolutamide has the potential to eradicate micrometastatic disease after either type of local therapy and decrease the death rate from prostate cancer. This pragmatic design incorporates current standard of care for all patients and the option for docetaxel to be added to ADT. As such, the data will be applicable for all patients with very high risk prostate cancer treated with local therapy and will be the first study incorporating docetaxel use as one of the standard of care options. Even if docetaxel is definitively proven to improve MFS and OS in the adjuvant setting, not all patients will be fit for docetaxel. This will be the first trial that has the potential to build upon current and future advances that may emerge and be the most effective strategy to decrease death rate from prostate cancer in the near term if it further augments docetaxel efficacy in chemo-fit patients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
1,100
2 x 300mg oral tablets twice daily for 96 weeks
2 oral tablets twice daily for 96 weeks
All participants are to receive standard background therapy with an LHRHA, as per standard of care. The choice of LHRHA is at the discretion of the treating clinician.
Metastasis-free survival
Evidence of metastases includes findings on WBBS or CT or MRI (as reported by the site investigator) that are either characteristic of metastatic prostate cancer, and/or confirmed by other test results e.g. cytology or histopathology.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Overall survival
Overall survival is defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to date of death from any cause, or the date of last known follow-up alive.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Prostate cancer-specific survival
Prostate cancer-specific survival is defined as the interval from the date of randomisation to the date of last known follow-up alive, or the date of death from prostate cancer. Deaths from other causes will be summarised.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
PSA-progression free survival
For participants who receive definitive radiotherapy (i.e. without radical prostatectomy), PSA progression is defined by the Phoenix criteria (requires confirmation by a repeat PSA performed at least 3 weeks later). For participants who have undergone a radical prostatectomy, an increase in PSA of \>0.2 ng/mL above the nadir would be considered PSA progression (requires confirmation by a repeat PSA performed at least 3 weeks later).
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Time to subsequent hormonal therapy
Time to subsequent hormone therapy is the interval from randomisation to the first date that endocrine therapy is recommenced or changed for the treatment of recurrent (or progressive) prostate cancer.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
All participants are to receive standard background therapy with curative-intent RT to the prostate or prostate bed as well as the pelvic lymph nodes using EBRT.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute - St. Elizabeth's
Brighton, Massachusetts, United States
Lahey Hospital and Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute - Milford
Milford, Massachusetts, United States
XCancer Omaha/Urology Cancer Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
New Jersey Urology Saddle Brook
Clifton, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth
Middletown, New Jersey, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen
Montvale, New Jersey, United States
New Jersey Urology Voorhees
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States
...and 83 more locations
Time to castration-resistance
Defined according to the PCWG3 criteria. If a participant has radiographic progression without serological progression, this will also be deemed castration resistant prostate cancer
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Frequency and severity of adverse events (CTCAE v5.0, RTOG/EORTC acute/late radiation morbidity criteria)
Safety reporting will describe the frequency and severity of AEs. The CTCAE v5.0 will be used to classify and grade the intensity of AEs occurring until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. The RTOG/EORTC Scoring Criteria will be used to assess morbidities related to radiation therapy (RT) until 6 years after randomisation. Acute AEs are those occurring within 90 days after starting RT, and will be classified and graded according to the RTOG/EORTC Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. Late AEs are those occurring more than 90 days after starting RT, and will be classified and rated according to the RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema.
Time frame: Approximately 12-weekly for 2 years from randomisation until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment.
Health-related quality of life
EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQC-30). Importance of quality of life issues are assessed using a four-point scale (1 = not at all, 4 = very much) EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire for Prostate Cancer (PR-25). Importance of quality of life issues are assessed using a four-point scale (1 = not at all, 4 = very much) Euroqol 5 item preference-based measure of health (EQ-5D-5L), comprising 5 questions with a score from 1 to 5 each and a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Fear of cancer recurrence
Using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI), a 42-item questionnaire with scores of 0 (never/not at all) - 4 (all the time/a great deal) for each.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years