Assessment of lung function requires the evaluation of pulmonary function by spirometry. However, some patients (e.g. children, elderly, or diseased individuals) may have difficulty performing the related forced maximal respiratory maneuver correctly. Forced oscillation technique (FOT) is increasingly being used in clinical settings to evaluate lung function noninvasively by measuring the mechanical input impedance of the respiratory system. FOT measures lung impedance during tidal breathing, requiring minimal patient cooperation. Recently a new methodology (within breath analysis) has emerged to evaluate changes that occur in the impedance during the breathing activity. The within-breath calculation of impedance allows separating the contribution of inspiration and expiration to the measured parameters. The purpose of this study is to establish reference ranges for within breath FOT parameters and their short term variability.
Purpose and rationale Assessment of lung function requires the evaluation of pulmonary function by spirometry. However, some patients (e.g. children, elderly, or diseased individuals) may have difficulty performing the related forced maximal respiratory maneuver correctly. Forced oscillation technique (FOT) is increasingly being used in clinical settings to evaluate lung function noninvasively by measuring the mechanical input impedance of the respiratory system. FOT measures lung impedance during tidal breathing, requiring minimal patient cooperation. Recently a new methodology (within breath analysis) has emerged to evaluate changes that occur in the impedance during the breathing activity. The within-breath calculation of impedance allows separating the contribution of inspiration and expiration to the measured parameters. The purpose of this study is to establish reference ranges for within breath FOT parameters and their short term variability. Objectives Primary: To derive equations to predict normal values and normality ranges for within-breath respiratory system resistance, reactance and related parameters at the selected stimulating waveform and to measure the short term variability of such parameters. Secondary: To demonstrate the equivalence of the results of a single multiple-breath test to results obtained as an average of 3 consecutive repeated tests. Study design This will be a prospective multi-center trial of healthy subjects. After signing the Informed Consent, an interview and physical examination will be performed. The examiner will confirm that subjects are able to perform acceptable and repeatable spirometry. FOT measurements will be performed, followed by standard spirometry measurements. Study Duration This is a single visit study. Subject participation will be completed in 1 hour and 15 min. Enrollment of all subjects is expected to take 23 weeks (6 months).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
231
Measurement of lung impedance by the Forced Oscillation Technique
Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor- UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Vermont Medical Center Inc.
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Rome, RM, Italy
U.O.C. Malattie dell'apparato respiratorio e endoscopia delle vie aeree - Ospedale San Giovanni
Roma, Rome, Italy
Correlation between respiratory impedance parameters and the following variables: age, height, weight, sex, abdominal circumference and phenotype, breathing pattern parameters.
The equation resulting from the multivariate regression analysis between impedance parameters assessed during the test and anthropometric measurements of age, height, weight, sex, abdominal circumference and phenotype, breathing pattern parameters
Time frame: 1 day
Noninferiority of one FOT test vs. the average of three consecutive tests
Noninferiority hypothesis of the results of a single test with multiple breaths free from artifacts compared to those obtained in the same session as an average or 3 consecutive repeated tests
Time frame: 1 day
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.