Objectives: (1) To analyze the effectiveness of adding a group-based form of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) or a behavioural activation program for depression (TACD) to the treatment as usual (TAU) for patients diagnosed of chronic pain and comorbid mild-moderate major depression; (2) To examine the cost-utility of these psychological treatments from healthcare and societal perspectives; (3) To measure a set of biomarkers alongside the RCT in order to know the physiological underpinnings of these psychological therapies and to identify potential predictors of treatment response. Methodology: 12-month multisite, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) Centres: Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (St. Boi de Llobregat) and Hospital del Mar (Barcelona). Participants. 225 adult patients with chronic pain that meet the diagnostic criteria for mild-moderate major depression will be randomly assigned to one of the three study arms: TAU + ACT vs. TAU + TACD vs. TAU. Primary outcome: Quality of life. Secondary outcomes: pain intensity, depression severity, anxiety symptoms, pain catastrophising, and pain acceptance. Costs to the healthcare system and to society and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). In addition, the empirically validated app Multicenter Pain Monitor® will be used to monitor participants alongside the treatments (ecological momentary assessment). Biomarkers: hair cortisol and cortisone, corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), ACTH and cortisol in plasma, and genotyping of 5 polymorphisms in the FKBP5 gene involved in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, cytokines, Th1: IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α; cytokines Th2: IL-10 + hsCRP test, and vitamin D levels. Main statistical analyses: Intention-to-Treat analyses that will include all participants who undergo random allocation, using multiple imputation to replace missing values. Linear mixed-effects models will be performed using Restricted Maximum Likelihood to estimate the parameters. Calculation of between-groups effect sizes using Cohen's d and of the number-needed-to-treat. Economic evaluation: cost-utility ratios evaluated by applying bootstrapping techniques, acceptability curves, and sensitivity analyses.
The IMPACT Project's main objective is to determine the effectiveness of adding to the standard care of patients with chronic pain and mild to moderate major depression a group programme based on ACT or a group programme based on BATD and analyse the cost-utility of these psychological treatments from a health and social perspective. Likewise, both in chronic pain and in other usually associated psychiatric diseases, there is a ubiquitous lack of knowledge about what specific psychological and physiological mechanisms are modified by these third generation psychotherapies and how they relate to the observed clinical results. The potential predictors of response to these treatments are also unknown. In chronic musculoskeletal pain where central sensitization plays an important role, alterations have been found in different markers associated with an increased experience of pain. Some of these alterations in markers (e.g. high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines) would also appear to be shared with other psychiatric diseases (major depression), a fact that would suggest a possible common mechanism involved in the etiopathogenesis of these diseases. Third generation psychotherapies have proven effective for pain management and regulation of the immune response. The IMPACT Multicentre Project (Improving Pain and Depression with ACT and BATD) will significantly expand the limited knowledge available about how ACT and BATD therapies exert their effects on relevant clinical improvement variables and will try to identify response predictive factors to these treatments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
234
Group treatment protocol of 8 weekly 90 minute sessions. Session 1: Presentation of the general concept of ACT therapy. Session 2: Value analysis I. Session 3: Value analysis II. Session 4: Value analysis III. Session 5: Values and feelings. Session 6: Taking a direction. Session 7: Dare and change. Session 8: Ready to act with ACT.
Group treatment protocol of 8 weekly 90 minute sessions. Session 1: Collection of information regarding areas of activity and interaction contexts. Session 2: Identification of information related to depressive behaviours. Session 3 Obtaining complementary information regarding the characteristics of the history of patient interactions and any contexts. Session 4: Explanation of the hypotheses of problematic behaviour, its maintenance and change throughout the intervention. Session 5: Once the 10 target activities have been identified, a record is made to track and their progress weekly. Session 6: Discussion of what was obtained from the records in general and of the satisfaction obtained, and explanation of the contexts and reinforcers. Session 7: Psycho-education Session 8: New behaviours, the goals achieved and the maintenance of the weekly activity are inquired about.
Standard pharmacological treatment usually provided to patients suffering chronic pain and mild-moderate depression.
Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (PSSJD)
Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Parc de Salut Mar
Barcelona, Spain
Aggregate score of the Physical Function, Body Pain and Vitality subscales of the SF-36
The range of scores is 15 to 65. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Numerical pain scale
Patients evaluate their pain in a continuum from 0 to 10, where 0 is absence of pain and 0 is the worst possible pain.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Scale of 14 items created to assess symptoms of anxiety and depression. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, and each subscale (HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression) includes 7 items with scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS)
Scale of 13 items comprising three dimensions: rumination over pain, magnification of pain and helplessness in the face of pain symptoms. The PCS total score and subscale scores are computed as the sum of ratings for each item. This study used the total score, which can vary from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating greater pain catastrophising.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.