Advanced glucose monitoring systems have revolutionized diabetes care and enabled people with diabetes to achieve better diabetes control with reduced risk of hypoglycaemia. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems provide real-time glucose monitoring and alarms when glucose approaches extreme readings (hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia) or when the change in glucose is rapid. All available CGM systems, except Dexcom G6, require daily calibrations with capillary glucose readings in order to attain accuracy of glucose readings. Decom G6 system is not widely accessible and only available in certain countries. Flash glucose monitoring systems (Flash) provide glucose readings when users actively scan their sensors. FreeStyle Libre (FSL) is the only Flash glucose monitoring system currently available in market. FSL is factory calibrated and sensors are ready to use after placement and initiation. The two main differences between Flash and CGM are user interaction and the alarm facility. While CGM provide real-time glucose readings, Flash is user-dependent for actively scanning and understanding the readings. Moreover, CGM systems provide alarms for low or high glucose and for rapid glucose changes, while Flash does not routinely provide alarms. This is particularly relevant when patients have impaired or lost hypoglycaemia awareness. CGM systems are costlier compared to Flash, which has contributed to the wider adoption of FSL. Several Bluetooth adjuncts have been introduced to market for FSL. These devices attach to Libre sensor and connect to the user's mobile phone via Bluetooth. This enables continuous and real-time feed of glucose readings from the sensor to patient's mobile phone, which enables a wide range of customizable alarms for high and low glucose levels and for rapid glucose changes. This setup also enables calibration of Libre sensor with capillary glucose which, anecdotally, has been reported to improve sensor accuracy. None of these adjuncts have been validated clinically. FSL with Bluetooth adjunct such as MiaoMiao remain cheaper than current CGM options and could be more accessible in some countries than CGM. However, without robust evidence to support effectiveness and safety of such setup it is not possible to recommend this. The Objective of this study is to determine whether FSL with Bluetooth Adjunct is superior to FSL alone in accuracy and reduction of hypoglycaemia burden.
Study design: Open-label, crossover, single center, randomized controlled trial of FreeStyle Libre with MiaoMiao Bluetooth transmitter adjunct with calibrations (FSL-M) compared to FreeStyle Libre alone (FSL-A) in people with T1DM. Protocol summary: Following informed written consent, subjects will be randomized to either FSL-M group using FSL with Miaomio and Tomato App premium version, or FSL-A with Libre Link app (stage 1). Subjects will spend 8 weeks in the assigned group followed by 2 weeks washout then subjects will switch over to the other group for further 8 weeks (stage 2). While in FSL-M, subjects will be asked to calibrate FSL with daily capillary glucose values using Contour Plus, or on days 1, 2, 4, 8, 13 of sensor life. Alarms for low glucose (\<3.9mmol/L, \<70mg/dL) and high glucose (\>13.9mmol/L, 250mg/dL) will be set in Tomato App. 7-point capillary glucose profiles will be carried out by subjects in both groups on days 2/3, 5/6, 9/10, 13/14 of each sensor life to enable paired comparison with sensor values. Subjects will have routine labs at randomization, end of stage 1, and end of stage 2. All subjects will be asked to complete the following questionnaires: GOLD, Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) and Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) at randomization, at end of stage1 and end of stage 2. The group randomized to FSL-M at stage 1 will have qualitative interview at randomization, end of stage 1 and end of stage 2. All adverse events will be collected including, but not limited to, all hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, hospital admissions for any reason, and device related skin reaction for the duration of the study in all subjects in both groups. Data analysis will be carried out on glucose data retrieved from Libre view web-platform and Tomato App downloads in addition to Contour Plus meter downloads.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Use of FreeStyle Libre with MiaoMiao Bluetooth adjunct and mobile device application to enable calibration and alarms
Use of standard FreeStyle Libre with Libre Link app and mobile phone scanning
Ali Aldibbiat
Kuwait City, Kuwait
Mean absolute relative difference (MARD)
Comparing difference between glucose readings from the sensor in comparison to reference paired capillary glucose readings. This is to enable assessing accuracy of the intervention with FSL and MiaoMiao
Time frame: 9 months
Percentage time below 3.0mmol/L (54mg/dL)
This is to enable evaluating burden of hypoglycaemia. Analysis will be done on sensor glucose data
Time frame: 9 months
Percentage time in range 4-10mmol/L
This is to enable effect on time spent in normoglycaemia. Analysis will be done on sensor glucose data
Time frame: 9 months
Percentage time <4mmol/L (72mg/dL)
to evaluate general hypoglycaemia
Time frame: 9 months
Percentage time >10mmol/L
To evaluate hyperglycaemia
Time frame: 9 months
Change in HbA1C
To evaluate for any change in overall diabetes control
Time frame: 9 months
Rate of hypoglycaemia
number of episodes of hypoglycaemia
Time frame: 9 months
Rate of severe hypoglycaemia
number of episodes of severe hypoglycamia
Time frame: 9 months
Rate of device-related complications
This is specific for Libe and/or MiaoMiao
Time frame: 9 months
Change in dose of insulin
This will compare before and at end of each phase total daily insulin dose
Time frame: 9 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.