This study investigates the feasibility of a gait-retraining program for older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The study will enroll 40 participants, with 20 receiving a gait retraining intervention and 20 receiving a graded walking program without gait retraining.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition affecting \~12% of older adults in the United States and is a leading cause of disability. Knee pain is a common clinical manifestation that leads individuals with OA to seek medical care. Current rehabilitation approaches (e.g., bracing, taping, foot orthoses, strengthening, etc.) aim to reduce knee joint loading, a well-accepted risk factor for knee OA and pain, but are not always effective. Altering gait mechanics to reduce knee loading has also been suggested. Gait retraining studies for individuals with knee OA have focused on increasing trunk lean and toe out angle to reduce the knee adduction moment (a surrogate measure of joint loading). However, these strategies create an abnormal gait pattern and may not be the best long-term solutions due to the potential injury to other joints which may limit their overall effectiveness and applicability to clinical practice. Impact loading, another mechanical factor related to knee OA, has been reduced using gait retraining strategies in runners with knee pain. It is unknown if gait retraining strategies to decrease impact loading can reduce symptoms of knee OA. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of a gait retraining program focusing on decreasing impact loading in individuals with knee OA. At baseline, following 8 intervention sessions, and at 1-month follow-up, participants will complete questionnaires, undergo three-dimensional gait analysis, and assessment of pressure pain threshold. Note: For participants enrolled during COVID-19 outbreak, only questionnaires will be collected at follow-up assessments.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
40
A progressive walking program with gait retraining will be performed on a treadmill at self-selected comfortable walking speed wearing an inertial measurement unit (IMU) on the medial aspect of the distal tibia. The (vertical) peak positive acceleration (PPA) of the tibia is a measure of tibial shock. Subjects will be provided real-time audio feedback to reduce PPA by 20% of their average peak PPA. During retraining sessions, a faded feedback approach will be used. Feedback will be provided continuously during the first four sessions and will be faded over the last 4 sessions. Walking time will increase over the 8 sessions.
A progressive walking program will also be performed on a treadmill where subjects will walk at a self-selected comfortable speed with the same walking times per session as the retraining group without any feedback or retraining cues.
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGRecruitment rate
\# of participants screened per month
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Enrollment rate
\# of participants enrolled per month
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Retention
% participants that complete all study visits
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Withdrawals/Terminated
Proportion of participants who withdraw or terminated by investigators and reasons why
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Adverse events (AE)/Unanticipated problems (UP)
Proportion of participants with AE/UP
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Vertical average loading rate
Slope of the most linear portion of the vertical ground reaction force curve, during early stance.
Time frame: Change from baseline to conclusion of intervention, an average of 1-month
Vertical instantaneous loading rate
Maximum slope of the most vertical portion of the vertical ground reaction force curve between successive data points, during early stance.
Time frame: Change from baseline to conclusion of intervention, an average of 1-month
Knee Pain with Activities
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
WOMAC questionnaire, pain sub scale 0-20
Time frame: Change from baseline to conclusion of intervention, an average of 1-month
Knee Pain Severity
Visual analog scale, 0-100
Time frame: Change from baseline to conclusion of intervention, an average of 1-month
Pressure pain threshold
Assessed using hand held algometer
Time frame: Change from baseline to conclusion of intervention, an average of 1-month