Chronic neck pain is a common disorder for spine specialists. Radiofrequency ablation of medial branches has been proven effective in selected patients for relieving pain. A newer radiofrequency ablation cannula has been developed (multi-tined), allowing perpendicular access. It is proposed as an alternative to the more technically challenging traditional approach. This study aims to compared the technical and clinical aspects of both techniques.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
50
Radiofrequency ablation of cervical medial branches
Centre Hospitalier Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Numerical Pain Rating scale for patient's pain during the procedure
pain during radiofrequency procedure will be compared between the 2 groups as a principal hypothesis is that the new multi-tined cannula is better tolerated by patients Scale is from 0-10, 0/10 is no pain which is better than pain of 10/10
Time frame: 1 day of the intervention
Fluoroscopy time
Calculated time of fluoroscopy in seconds
Time frame: 1 day of the intervention
Radiation dosage
Calculated dose of radiation measure by the C-arm
Time frame: 1 day of the intervention
time of procedure
Total time of procedure in minutes/seconds
Time frame: 1 day of the intervention
Patient pain (Numerical Rating Scale - NRS score)
therapeutic effect on pain Scale is from 0-10, 0/10 is no pain which is better than pain of 10/10
Time frame: 0, 3, 6 12 months
Patient function (Neck disability Index - NDI)
therapeutic effect on function scale is from 0-100%, where 0% is better than 100% in terms of the effect of pain on function
Time frame: 0, 3, 6, 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.