Phase I / II pilot clinical trial, to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of the systemic infusion of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow (BM-MSCs) from a haploidentical donor to improve the healing process and / or the mucocutaneous fragility phenotype associated with EBDR.
The Main Objective is to evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of haploidentical MSCs derived from bone marrow administered by intravenous injection for the treatment of patients with RDBS. The assessment of the symptomatic improvement of the treated patients will be made regarding the baseline situation and the response to treatment at the biochemical, histological and molecular level. Secondary Objectives: Describe the clinical and molecular phenotype of the mucocutaneous involvement of patients, including the characterization of the mutations responsible for the disease. Study drug: Allogenic mesenchymal cells (haploidentical) derived from bone marrow and expanded. Method of administration: Systemic / Intravenous Administration dose: 2-3x10e6 BM-MSC / Kg. Weekly dose for three consecutive weeks Follow-up period: 12 months after the infusion. However, patients will be monitored outside the clinical trial over a 5-year period
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
9
Procedure: Haploidentical MSCs derived from bone marrow administered by intravenous injection with a dose of 2-3x106 cells / Kg
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Spain
Safety evaluation: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by protocol.
To evaluate the safety of haploidentical MSCs derived from bone marrow administered by intravenous injection with a dose of 2-3x106 cells / Kg in 3 infusions separated by 21 days each for the treatment of patients with RDEB: All adverse events will be registered for 1 year from first infusion of cells as assessed by grade: mild, moderate or severe (according to protocol)
Time frame: 1 year after infusion
Cutaneous mechanical resistance
Cutaneous mechanical resistance measured using a negative pressure cutaneous suction device from Electronic Diversities (NP-2 model).
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Skin surface affected
Percentage of skin surface affected in patients with RDEB
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Number of blisters
Quantification of the number of blisters in patient with RDEB
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Non-specific general markers of systemic inflammation: white blood cell count
Biomarkers evaluated are white blood cell count (109/L)
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Non-specific general markers of systemic inflammation: Negative acute phase reactant (albumin)
Biomarkers evaluated are negative acute phase reactants: albumin (g/dl)
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Non-specific general markers of systemic inflammation: Negative acute phase reactants (pre-albumin, transferrin and retinol-binding protein)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Biomarkers evaluated are negative acute phase reactants: pre-albumin, transferrin, and retinol-binding protein (mg/dl)
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Non-specific general markers of systemic inflammation: Positive acute phase reactants (c-reactive protein and fibrinogen)
Biomarkers evaluated are positive acute phase reactants: C reactive protein and fibrinogen (mg/dl)
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Non-specific general markers of systemic inflammation: Positive acute phase reactants (ferritin)
Biomarkers evaluated are positive acute phase reactants: ferritin (ng/ml)
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Severity index according to "The Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score" before and after treatment
The Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa Severity Score evaluated the severity of disease before and after treatment. Eleven items were scored: area of damaged skin, involvement of nails, mouth, eyes, larynx and oesophagus, scarring of hands, skin cancer, chronic wounds, alopecia and nutritional compromise (giving a maximum score of 100, where 0 = better outcome and 100 = worse outcome)
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Severity index according to "The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) before and after treatment
The Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) used to classify patients according to disease severity and clinical response in three types: mild, moderate and severe (obtained by the analysis of 12 skin sites in addition to the scalp, mucous membranes, nails and other epithelized surfaces - total activity (of 276) and damage (of 230) combine to give an overall score of 506; where 0 = better outcome and 506 = worse outcome).
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Expression of Collagen VII (C7) in skin biopsy
Expression of Collagen VII (C7) in skin biopsy will be analyzed by immunofluorescence with antibodies specific for the NC1 domain of collagen VII.
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Analysis of anchoring fibrils
Analysis of anchoring fibrils by electron microscopy in skin biopsy after treatment
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Variation of pain respect to baseline status: Visual Analog Scale
Variation of pain with respect to baseline that will be assessed using the Visual Analogy Scale (VAS) in all visits after the first infusion, used different type of VAS scale depends on age of subject. Range was 1 to 10, where 10 are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Modification in itching perceived
Assessment of the change in the itching perceived respect baseline status will be assessed by Leuven Itch Scale or Itch Man Scale, depends on the age of the subject. These scales are the instrument to evaluate itching perceived in patients with pruritus origin different. There subscale in 6 domains: frequency, duration, severity, distress, impact, and area: Itch frequency score: scale from 0 to 100. (Maximum score 100, itching all the time - is worse outcome) Itch severity score: scale from 0 to 100 (Maximum score 100, maximum severity =worse outcome) Itch distress score: scale from 0 to 100 (Maximum score 100, maximum distress = worse outcome) Itch consequences score: scale from 0 to 100 (Maximum score 100, maximum consequences = worse outcome) Itch Surface area score: Scale from 0 to 100 (Maximum score is 100, the entire body = worse outcome).
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Change in quality of life of patient: European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 level (EUROQL-5D)
Assessment of the change in quality of life: survey of specific assessment of the quality of life (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 level; EUROQL-5D). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, habitual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of gravity, where a value of 1 is better outcome and 3 is worse outcome. Also, there are a 2nd part included a VAS scale, where 0 = worse outcome and 100 =better outcome.
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Evaluation of circulating anti-C7 antibodies
Analysis of circulating anti-C7 antibodies determined by ELISA before and after treatment.
Time frame: 2 year after infusion
Change in general condition of the patient
Evaluation of the changes produced in the patient before and after the study treatment, assessing according to the set of tests performed on the patient during the same; indicating it through a Likert scale, from 1-4, where 4 is the most serious evaluation and 1 is the slightest.
Time frame: 2 year after infusion