The Biomechanical Effects of Manual Therapy - A Feasibility Study

Bournemouth University16 enrolled

Overview

The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial to explore if there is a change in intervertebral movement following a course of manual therapy in patients with acute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Research Questions: 1. In patients with acute NSLBP, does lumbar intervertebral movement change following a course of manual therapy? 2. In patients with acute NSLBP, do those who respond to manual therapy (established by patient reported outcomes measures) have different intervertebral movement to those who do not?

Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a leading cause of disability and work-days lost worldwide. Yet, in most cases we do not know the specific cause. It is thought to be due to abnormal movement between the spinal bones (vertebrae). The investigators can now measure movement between vertebrae using low-dose quantitative fluoroscopy (QF), or motion x-ray videos. QF is a reliable method of measuring spinal movement which is non-invasive and does not expose the patient to a lot of radiation. In this study, QF will be used as a measuring tool to measure spinal movement in patients with acute NSLBP before manual therapy versus after manual therapy to explore if there is a change in spinal movement. Research suggests that some patients respond to manual therapy and some do not, a secondary question in this study is to explore if there are differences in spinal movement between those who respond to manual therapy (measured using pain and disability questionnaires) and those who do not. This study is a feasibility study to determine whether the study can be carried out as a full-scale trial. Participants will be recruited from the AECC University College (AECC UC) Clinic. Following an examination, patients with acute low back pain, and who are eligible for the study will be invited to join. Participants will proceed with initial measurements which include validated questionnaires and QF. Following these measurements participants will be randomised into two groups, each containing 15 participants. Both groups will receive an evidence-informed home management booklet, the manual therapy group will receive five manual therapy treatments in two weeks. Participants will return for follow-up measurements two weeks after baseline measurements.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Interventions

Manual therapyOTHER

Manual therapy, which includes spinal manipulation; spinal mobilisation; light massage; and trigger point therapy.

Evidence-informed home management bookletOTHER

The home management booklet includes advice on posture, over the counter pain medication, cold and heat packs. The booklet also includes a section on patient reassurance and where to seek help from a medical professional in an emergency.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 65 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with acute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), without leg pain, of at least 2 weeks duration, but no more than 4 weeks duration * Patients between the ages of 18 and 65 Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who cannot understand written English and unable to provide full informed consent. * Patients who are currently involved in another research study * Patients with a BMI over 30 (less likely to obtain the required information from the images) * Pregnancy or potentially pregnant * Previous ionising radiation exposure within the last 6 months greater than 8mSv. * Previous lumbar spine surgery, as well as recent abdominal or pelvic surgery (within the last 12 months). * Scoliosis or positive Adams forward Bending Test for Scoliosis. * Diagnosed Osteoporosis (Bone Density Scan) * Patients with a numeric pain scale of 8 or more, or 2 or less, taken at the New Patient Examination Appointment. * Manual therapy already received for this episode of NSLBP * Litigation or compensation pending * Diagnosis of depression (by a medical doctor) within the last 12 months.

Locations (1)

Bournemouth University

Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Ratio of presenting patients and eligible patients

Ratio of the number of patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain vs. number of eligible patients (according to eligibility criteria)

Time frame: 1 year

Ratio of patients approached vs. number of participants who consent to trial

Rate of conversion from number of patients approached (who are eligible for the trial) to number of participants who consent to be a part of the trial.

Time frame: 1 year

Incidence of participant withdrawal

Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who withdraw from the trial (where the participant withdraws from the trial)

Time frame: 1 year

Incidence of participant being withdrawn

Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who have been withdraw from the trial (where the practitioner withdraws the participant from the trial)

Time frame: 1 year

Participant compliance in arm one

Ratio of total participants in arm one vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm one)

Time frame: 1 year

Participant compliance in arm two

Ratio of total participants in arm two vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm two)

Time frame: 1 year

Number of participants who experienced adverse or serious adverse events

Ratio of total number of participants (in both groups) vs. serious adverse events, as well as adverse events.

Time frame: 1 year

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Secondary Outcomes

Bournemouth Questionnaire

Baseline and follow up Bournemouth Questionnaire scores. Scale data from 0 - 70, where 0 is the best outcome and 70 is the worst outcome. Minimally Important Change = 26.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire - 24

Baseline and follow up Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire - 24. Scale data from 0 - 24, where 0 is the best outcome and 24 is the worst outcome. Minimally Important Change = 5.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Inter-vertebral range of angular motion

Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). QF systems combines fluoroscopy, with a computer-based process which tracks the vertebrae motion and calculates inter-vertebral movement variables. Inter-vertebral range of angular motion is scale data measured in degrees.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Sagittal translation

Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Sagittal translation is scale data measured in millimetres.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Laxity

Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Laxity is scale data and represents initial attainment rate.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Anterior disc height

Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Anterior disc height is scale data measured in millimetres.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Motion Sharing Inequality (MSI)

Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). MSI is scale data and calculated as the average of the maximum distances between levels (L2-L5) at all data points.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Motion Sharing Variability (MSV)

Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). MSV is scale data and calculated as the square root of the variance between levels (L2-L5) at all data points.

Time frame: 2 weeks