Tooth-coloured fixed restorations are becoming increasingly popular with patients and dentists. If high-strength all-ceramics such as zirconia are used as the restoration material, a maximum of two adjacent missing teeth can be replaced with the aid of fixed partial dentures (FPDs). For the replacement of a missing anterior or posterior tooth by FPDs, a very good clinical performance similar to that of metal-based, ceramic-veneered restorations can be expected. However, evidence-based statements on the clinical performance of long-span all-ceramic FPDs are difficult because there are only very few studies on this topic, which are also inhomogeneous with regard to the study conditions. Randomized studies to compare monolithic (consisting only of the high-strength framework material) or partially veneered (weaker veneering ceramics in esthetically relevant tooth areas) all-ceramic and classic (completely veneered) metal-ceramic FPDs are lacking. The aim of the current explorative, prospective, randomized, two-arm clinical interventional study is therefore to compare the clinical performance of long-span FPDs (≥ 4 Pontics) made of monolithic / facially veneered zirconium dioxide with a gold standard (completely veneered cobalt chromium (CoCr)-based FPDs). Forty patients will be recruited. Once all inclusion criteria have been established, including the signed informed consent of the patients informed of the content, effort, advantages and disadvantages of the study, patients are assigned to the two study groups by stratified block randomization (main strata: tooth-supported / (tooth-)implant-supported). After placement of the restorations, follow-up examinations are performed after 1 week (baseline) and after half a year, one year, two years and three years. In addition to the main target criterion (veneering defects), further complications (related to FPDs or supporting tissues / structures) and parameters of oral health are recorded. Depending on the distribution and structure of the data, parametric and non-parametric statistics are used. Group differences with respect to the main target criterion ceramic defects are to be investigated by log-rank and chi-square tests. The significance level is set at α \< 0.05. Since this is an explorative study, all p-values are descriptive.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
Participant receives one monolithic / facially veneered zirconia fixed partial denture retained by either teeth, implants or teeth and implants for the replacement of two neighbouring posterior teeth.
Participant receives one completely veneered CoCr fixed partial denture retained by either teeth, implants or teeth and implants for the replacement of two neighbouring posterior teeth.
Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
RECRUITINGTime-dependent ceramic defect rate
The time to the occurrence of a ceramic defect is used as the main target criterion. Ceramic defects are identified in a structured clinical examination after cleaning and drying of the restoration surface and with the aid of magnifying glasses.
Time frame: 3 years
Restoration survival
Time-dependent survival rate
Time frame: 3 years
Abutment-tooth survival
Time-dependent survival rate of abutment teeth
Time frame: 3 years
Implant survival
Time-dependent survival rate of implants
Time frame: 3 years
Restoration success
Time-dependent complication-free survival rate of restorations
Time frame: 3 years
Abutment-tooth success
Time-dependent complication-free survival rate of abutment teeth
Time frame: 3 years
Implant success
Time-dependent complication-free survival rate of implants
Time frame: 3 years
Risk-factor analysis
Identification of influencing factors (risk factors such as sex, the position of the fixed partial denture in the upper or lower jaw, a tooth or implant-supported design, and the activity of the masticatory muscles) for the occurrence of complications.
Time frame: 3 years
Gingival / mucosal, periodontal / periimplant health of the abutment teeth / implants
The gingival / mucosal inflammation is evaluated categorically (0 - 3) on the basis of the gingival index (GI) according to Loe and Silness. Periodontal / periimplant health is assessed by measuring the pocket depth around teeth and implants using a millimeter-scaled periodontal probe and by simultaneously measuring the incidence of bleeding on probing (BOP) and suppuration.
Time frame: 3 years
Plaque accumulation
The accumulation of dental / peri-implant plaque is determined categorically (0 - 3) on the basis of the Plaque Index (PI) according to Silness and Loe.
Time frame: 3 years
Patients' satisfaction with restoration esthetics
Satisfaction with the esthetics of the restorations is assessed by the patient on a 6-point visual analogue scale.
Time frame: 3 years
Wear on the restoration and the natural opposing dentition
Quantification of the clinical wear (vertical height loss and volume loss) that has occurred on the restorations and antagonistic material using 3D superimposed diagnostic models
Time frame: 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.