The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the implant fixation of the NANOS™ Neck Preserving Hip Stem (OHST Medizintechnik AG, distributed by Smith \& Nephew GmbH, Marl, Germany) by measuring the migration of the implant using the model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (MBRSA).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, Germany
Evaluation of migration pattern of the Nanos stem
Measuring migration used the model-based RSA method
Time frame: 2 years
Change in quality of life
Measuring change in quality of life using the Short Form (SF) 36 Mental Component Score * Minimum Value: 0 (worst outcome) * Maximum Value: 100 (best outcome)
Time frame: 2 years
Harris Hip Score
Investigator assessed outcome score Minimum: 0 (worst outcome) Maximum: 100 (best outcome)
Time frame: 2 years
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scale
Score rating the patient's current activity level * Minimum: 1 (wholly inactive subject) * Maximum: 10 (totally active subject)
Time frame: 2 years
Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Score representing patient's current pain intensity * Minimum: 0 (no pain) * Maximum: 100 (very severe pain)
Time frame: 2 years
Postel Merle d'Aubigné-Score
Score grading the functional value of the hip * Minimum: 0 (worst outcome) * Maximum: 6 ( best outcome) Grading is done in each of the three dimensions: pain, mobility and ability to walk.
Time frame: 2 years
Hip Disability and Ostheoarthritis Outcome Score
Patient reported outcome * Minimum: 0 (best outcome) * Maximum: 96 (worst outcome)
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Radiographic Evaluation
Evaluation of radiographic images regarding implant position, implant fixation, heterotopic ossifications (HO), radiolucencies, osteolysis, atrophy and hypertrophy
Time frame: 2 years
Number of adverse events
Collection of adverse events
Time frame: 2 years