To investigate the efficacy and mechanisms of change of an Internet-delivered transdiagnostic REBT intervention for adolescents with internalizing problems.
The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of change of an Internet-delivered Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy for adolescents (12-15 years) diagnosed with a principal anxiety or depressive disorder according to DSM-5 criteria. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two groups: experimental (REBTonAd) and waitlist control. The intervention is structured in 8 modules and will be delivered over six weeks. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: baseline, post-treatment, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
106
The protocol is based on Rational Emotive and Behavioral Therapy (REBT; Ellis, 1962, 1994). The program will consist of 8 modules, delivered online over six weeks.
Babeș-Bolyai University
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania
Internalizing problems measured with the Youth Self-Report 11/18 (YSR; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001)
Change in self-reported internalizing problems from baseline to post-treatment, at 6 months post treatment. Higher scores indicate higher levels of internalizing problems.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediately after the intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks), 6-month follow-up
Automatic Thoughts QuestionnaireShort Version (ATQ-SV; Netemeyer et al., 2002)
Change in negative automatic thoughts from baseline. Higher scores indicating higher levels of negative automatic thoughts.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediately after the intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks), 6-month follow-up
The child and adolescent scale of irrationality (CASI; Bernard & Cronan, 1999)
Change in irrational beliefs from baseline. Higher scores indicate higher levels of irrational beliefs.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediately after the intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks), 6-month follow-up
The Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents, The Revised Version - adolescent version (Kiddo-KINDL; Ravens-Sieberer, & Bullinger, 1998)
Change in quality of life from baseline from baseline. Higher scores indicate higher levels of quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediately after the intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks), 6-month follow-up
The Adolescent Peer Relations Instrument (APRI; Parada, 2000)
Change in bullying victimization from baseline. Higher scores indicate higher levels of peer victimization.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediately after the intervention (an expected average of 6 weeks), 6-month follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Principal diagnosis based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria
Diagnostic interview for anxiety disorders and/or depressive disorders
Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up