This is a multicenter, non-blinded, patient preference comparative trial for efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on drug-resistant epilepsy compared to continued vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) optimization in children with failed VNS. The two conditions being compared are therefore DBS (treatment) versus VNS (control). Fifty (50) patients will be recruited and enrolled in this pilot study (25 from The Hospital for Sick Children and 50 from CHU Sainte-Justine).
For children with epilepsy that have failed pharmacological and alternative treatments (drug-resistant epilepsy; \[DRE\]), surgical interventions may be considered. This includes vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). VNS for the treatment of DRE in children is an established and widely used treatment. Unfortunately, the positive response to VNS rate (\>50% reduction in seizures) is not consistent, ranging from 26-55% in pediatric epilepsy patients. In children with failed VNS, defined as no improvement in seizure control after at least 1 year of treatment, they may undergo DBS as a recommended therapy. DBS is a safe and established treatment for various childhood neurological conditions and the indications for DBS in children continue to expand. It is currently unknown which children may benefit from DBS after failed VNS. As a patient-preference randomized trial, patients and their parents will be introduced to the options of continuing with current VNS management (control arm) or trialing DBS (treatment arm). Patients and their parents will fall into three possible groups according to preference and willingness for randomization. i) Patients with no strong preferences and consent to randomization ii) Patients with a preference, yet still consent to randomization iii) Patients who refuse randomization and opt for enrollment in a specific arm Patients in the treatment arm will receive DBS of the centromedian nucleus. The centromedian nucleus is believed to reduce electrocortical activity in generalized epilepsy. The investigators hypothesize that stimulating this target will lead to a decrease in seizure severity and frequency in patients who have failed VNS; in comparison with patients who will have continued VNS treatment and optimization. Patients in the control arm will continue to be observed for 12 months with no change to their treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
25
Patients will receive surgical implantation of the Medtronic DBS device (Device # 37601). Two (2) electrodes will be implanted bilaterally in the centromedian nucleus.
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Seizure reduction after DBS surgery
Measured by the Class on the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale, where: Class I: Free of disabling seizures IA: Completely seizure-free since surgery IB: Non disabling simple partial seizures only since surgery IC: Some disabling seizures after surgery, but free of disabline seizures for at least 2 years ID: Generalized convulsions with antiepileptic drug withdrawal only Class II: Rare disabling seizures ("almost seizure-free") IIA: Initially free of disabling seizures but has rare seizures now IIB: Rare disabling seizures since surgery IIC: More than rare disabling seiuzres after surgery, but rare seizures for at least 2 years IID: Nocturnal seizures only Class III: Worthwhile improvement IIIA: Worthwhile seiuzre reduction IIIB: Prolonged seiuzre-free intervals amounting to greater than half the follow-up period, but not less than 2 years Class IV: No worthwhile improvement IVA: Significant seizure reduction IVB: No appreciable change IVC: Seizures worse
Time frame: Assessed post surgery up to 1 year
Seizure reduction after VNS surgery
Measured by the Class on the McHugh Scale, where: Class I (80-100% reduction in seizure frequency) Class II (50-79% reduction in seizure frequency) Class III (\< 50% reduction in seizure frequency) Class IV (Magnet benefit only) Class V (No improvement)
Time frame: Assessed post surgery up to 1 year
Change in patient-perceived seizure severity
Measured by the Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (LSSS) which measures patients' own perceptions of changes in seizure severity. The LSSS is rated on a 4-point likert scale, where 1 represents "always" (worse outcome) and 4 represents "never" (better outcome).
Time frame: Assessed pre surgery and post surgery up to 1 year
Change in parent-perceived seizure severity
Measured by the Hague Seizure Severity (HASS) scale which measures parents' perceptions of changes in seizure severity. The HASS is measured on a 4 point likert-scale, where 1 represents "always" (worse outcome) and 4 represents "never" (better outcome).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Assessed pre surgery and post surgery up to 1 year
Change in self-reported quality of life
Measured by the Quality of Life in Epilepsy for Adolescents scale (QOLIE-AD-48), a two-part scale. Part 1 measures general health on a 5 point scale where 1 represents "excellent" (better outcome) and 5 represents "poor" (worse outcome). Part 2 measures effects of epilepsy and antiepilepsy medications on a 5 point scale where 1 represents "very often" (worse outcome) and 5 represents "never" (better outcome).
Time frame: Assessed pre surgery and post surgery up to 1 year