This pilot work will determine the feasibility of tDCS intervention as an effective adjunct intervention to PT aimed at improving gait, balance, and mobility in older adults at risk of falling.
Falls are correlated with both physical and cognitive declines in older adults. Recurrent fallers and those at high risk of falls are often referred to physical therapy (PT) for gait and balance training. Although physical therapists are aware of the importance of cortical control of gait and balance, there is no available tool to directly yet non-invasively intervene brain in the clinical setting. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive and safe mean of modulating the excitability of specific brain regions and their connected neural networks. Our group and others have shown that tDCS intervention designed to facilitate the excitability of the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) improves numerous aspects of executive function related to mobility in older adults. However, no studies to date have assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of applying tDCS as an adjunct to PT to improve gait and balance within the geriatric rehabilitation setting. This study aims to 1) assess the feasibility of implementing tDCS prior to each of their first 10 PT sessions, and 2) gather estimates of variability in outcomes related to gait, balance, cognition, and quality of life over time within older adults referred to PT for recurrent falls.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
10
The participant will receive 20-minute sessions of real tDCS before each physical therapy visit for up to 10 combined sessions, over approximately 6 weeks.
The participant will receive 20-minute sessions of sham stimulation before each physical therapy visit for up to 10 combined sessions, over approximately 6 weeks.
Hebrew Rehabilitation Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Screening to enrollment ratio (%, 0-100, higher ratio means a better outcome)
The number of screenings needed to enroll one participant
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)
Intervention adherence rate (%, 0-100, higher ratio means a better outcome)
Number of tDCS sessions completed
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)
Adherence rate (%, 0-100, higher ratio means a better outcome)
The portion of enrolled participants who complete and adhere to the intervention who complete and adhere to the intervention
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)
Side effects
The number, type, severity and duration of reported side effects
Time frame: The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)
Change from baseline in the dual task cost to gait speed (reduced dual task cost after intervention means a better outcome)
The change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes gait speed
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)
Change from baseline in the dual task cost to standing postural sway speed (reduced dual task cost after intervention means a better outcome)
The change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes the control of standing posture.
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)
Change from baseline in Trail Making Test B - A (reduced time after intervention means a better outcome)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The change from baseline in cognitive executive function
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)
Change from baseline in gait speed (increased value after intervention means a better outcome)
The change from baseline in gait speed
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)
Change from baseline in gait variability (reduced value after intervention means a better outcome)
The change from baseline in gait speed
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)
Change from baseline in gradual-onset continuous performance test (gradCPT) ( increased accuracy after intervention means a better outcome)
The change from baseline in cognitive sustained attention
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)
Change from baseline in Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) (reduced time after intervention means a better outcome)
The change from baseline in overall mobility function
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)
Change from baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score (increased score after intervention means a better outcome)
The change from baseline in global cognitive function
Time frame: Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)