This study compares the peri-implant soft tissue and crestal bone loss around single implants when placed macrosurgically and microsurgically.
Black triangles in dentition especially in the anterior teeth would pose an esthetic concern. Interdental papilla height is crucial for eliminating this black triangle. 32 participants, 16 in two groups were assigned randomly. Microsurgical approach using microsurgical instruments and magnifying loupes were used for one group participants and similar procedure without magnifying loupes and microsurgical instruments was done in the other group. comparsion of the microsurgical outcome is done by measuring peri implant papilla gain and radiographic crestal bone loss will be done between the groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
20
microsurgical dental implant placement employin splt finger technique by Misch
macrosurgical placement of single dental implants
Krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences and hospital
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
peri-implant papilla height
mesial and distal peri implant papilla height is measured in millimeter
Time frame: 1 year
marginal gingiva
buccal marginal gingival height is measured
Time frame: 1 year
jemt papilla index
papillary height gained around implant is scored using jemt papilla index 0 = no papilla and no indication of a curvature of the soft tissue adjacent to the implant crown are present; 1. = less than one-half of the papilla height is present, and a convex curvature of the soft tissue adjacent to the implant crown and adjacent tooth can be observed; 2. = at least one-half of the papilla height is present but not to the contact point between the teeth, the papilla is not completely harmonious with the adjacent papillae between the permanent teeth, and soft tissue is harmonious with adjacent teeth; 3. = the papilla fills the entire proximal space and is harmonious with the adjacent papillae, and soft-tissue contour is optimal; 4. = the papillae are hyperplastic and cover too much of the implant or the adjacent tooth, and the soft-tissue contour is irregular
Time frame: 1 year
crestal bone loss
radiographic crestal bone level around the implants measured from 1st thread of the implant to the coronal or apical most bone level in millimeters.
Time frame: 1 year
pink esthetic score
scoring assigned to 7 soft tissue criteria by an examiner as 0,1,2,3 and the average of the total score is considered the final score. a maximum score of 14 can be alloted
Time frame: 1 year
surgical time taken
the time taken right from the incision to the implant placement is watched and recorded.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1 day
visual analogue scale score
aesthetic score by the outcome investigator using VAS score sheet of 10 points. 1 being most painful and 10 being painless
Time frame: 1 year
probing depth
peri implant probing depth at each follow up was recorded
Time frame: 1 year
plaque index
plaque scores were recorded at each follow up 0.-0.9 good 1.0-1.9-fair 2-3-poor
Time frame: 1 year
gingival index
gingival index scores were recorded at each followup 0.1-1-mild gingivitis 1.1-2- moderate gingivitis 2.1-3 severe gingivitis
Time frame: 1 year