Uncontrolled and Possible Severe Asthma in Denmark

Overview

Asthma is a common, chronic disease with a high prevalence in children, adolescents and populations normally fit-to-work. Most asthma patients have a well-controlled disease and thereof a low usage of primary and secondary health care, as well as few sick days. With difficult-to-treat and severe asthma, a much higher health care and sick leave resource usage is seen. Previous studies show that only 1/3rd of patients prescribed high-dose, possibly side effect-laden, medications for difficult-to-treat or possible severe asthma have been seen by a specialist, such as a pulmonologist. Our study aims to identify socioeconomical patterns and describe patients who are in high dosage asthma treatments, without being seen or treated by a specialist. Furthermore, The Investigators wish to investigate the impact of a systematic pulmonary assessment on quality of life, healthcare utilization and social benefit usage in patients with possible severe asthma. The results are meant to provide a dataset to identify weaknesses in asthma treatment on a national level, and to lay a foundation for future quality improvements to asthma care in Denmark.

Background \& Aim Asthma is the most common chronic disease among children, adolescents and adults. When the diagnosis has been confirmed and the necessary level of treatment established, a well-treated asthma patient is an individual without asthma symptoms. However, asthma is a heterogeneous disease and achieving disease control is far from easy in all asthma patients, although the exact proportion of this problem in real life is unknown. In Denmark, CPR provides the opportunity to track all patients with regard to diagnosis and management, and on a one-by-one basis to merge several informative registers to follow prescribed medication, filled prescriptions, education, area of residence, job, sick leave and referral to secondary care for both asthma and co-morbidities. Based on analysis of data on filled prescriptions from the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database (DNHSPD), it has been demonstrated that only one third of patients classified as having uncontrolled asthma are seen in secondary care. Based on a nationwide asthma database and clinical confirmation, The Investigators aim to: * Describe the patient demographics and disease-burden in patients with possible hidden severe asthma in Denmark, using the national databases. * Elucidate the real-world prevalence of hidden severe asthma in Denmark, by systematic assessment of patients with possible hidden severe asthma. * Investigate the impact of systematic asthma assessment on quality of life and asthma control in patients with possible hidden severe asthma. Hypotheses \& Expected results 1. Within the last year, a large proportion of asthma patients (75%) prescribed medium to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have not had their lung function measured, had no new asthma drugs prescribed and have not been referred to secondary care for further assessments. 2. A significant number of asthma patients in primary care are prescribed high doses of ICS and filled prescriptions for \>200 puffs of rescue medication (short-acting beta 2-agonists (SABA) or anticholinergics (SAMA)) per year over a period of 2 years, exhibiting low disease awareness of the difficult to manage asthma patients by both doctors and patients. 3. In primary care, more than 75% of asthma patients prescribed high dose ICS and a second controller have been seen in secondary care within the last year, leaving few (25%) with possible hidden severe asthma in primary care. 4. In primary care, there is a significant mismatch between general practitioner (GP)-based diagnosis of severe asthma (based on prescription data) and the true prevalence of severe asthma following guideline-based systematic assessment for severe asthma. 5. A systematic pulmonary assessment in patients with possible severe asthma leaves few with a severe asthma diagnosis and increases disease control in patients with moderate-to-mild asthma. A significant proportion of patients are able to step-down in inhaled steroid treatment as described in GINA guidelines. Methods The initial studies are designed as retrospective, observational studies with a real-world evidence, registrybased design. The study period is 1/6-14 to 31/5-18. Databases used are: * Danish Clinical Registries (DCR) - Asthma * National Patient Registry (NPR) \& Statistics Denmark (DST) * The Danish National Health Service Prescription Database (DNHSPD) The clinical follow-up (reassessment) study is designed as an interventional, non-randomized, non-blinded clinical study with the aim of assessing the effect of systematic asthma assessment (as suggested by the Nordic Severe Asthma Network) on patients with possible severe asthma not seen by a pulmonologist. Effects are measured as 1. improvements of symptoms and quality of life according to questionnaires and 2. improvements of clinical variables such as lower peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability.