The study aims to investigate two new non-invasive technologies for assessing skin properties to identify and validate a range of safety biomarkers that may be considered useful as primary outcome measures for evaluating the safety of topical treatments in atopic dermatitis. The method of assessing these biomarker technologies will be to determine whether twice daily treatment with crisaborole (2%) ointment, compared to betamethasone valerate (0.1%) cream, for up to 4 weeks, may cause skin structure or function changes, like skin atrophy, in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).
The first-line drug treatment for mild-moderate AD are currently topical corticosteroids (TCS) with recognized efficacy. However, their prolonged or inappropriate use, can lead to local adverse effects. Side-effects of topical corticosteroids comprise a variety of skin changes in the sense of skin atrophy thinning of the skin and in some cases development of telangiectasia, spontaneous scars, folliculitis, striae distensae (stretch marks), contact dermatitis, acne or rosacea depending on potency, galenic formulation, patient age and body area to which the medication will be applied, exposure time. Assessing the safety (local adverse effects) of current or new treatments and new treatment approaches using existing treatments through noninvasively monitor on possible early skin (subclinical) changes associated with the local clinical adverse effects of treatment may be an effective step for an enhanced AD treatment management. Primary Aim: To further develop and validate two new non-invasive technologies for the assessment of early sub-clinical skin changes associated with adverse effects and to derive an optimum panel of safety biomarkers for use in future clinical trials of topical anti-inflammatory treatments. The safety of two topical anti-inflammatory treatments for AD will be compared in this clinical trial, with a focus on early sub-clinical signs: crisaborole 2% ointment and betamethasone valerate 0,1% cream. Step 1 involves the collection of data on the early sub-clinical skin changes using the non-invasive technologies: OCT and FTIR spectroscopy. The data from this study will then be used to identify and refine biophysical biomarkers of skin atrophy and skin barrier disruption in steps 2 and 3. Secondary Aim: To determine the relative local skin effects of crisaborole (2%) ointment compared to a potent and moderately potent TCS in participants with mild to moderate AD. The focus is on 'early biomarkers' of 'local skin changes'and not clinical efficacy, which has been established in previous trials. Rationale for selecting the two comparators are related to prescription behaviors in UK (Betamethasone valerate 0,1% cream) and with no reported TCS-like local adverse effects profile (crisaborole 2% ointment)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
37
twice daily application on one forearm for 4 weeks (randomised site allocation)
twice daily application on one forearm for 4 weeks (randomised site allocation)
Sheffield Dermatology Research, University of Sheffield Medical School, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Change in Epidermal Thickness
The difference in the change in epidermal thickness, measured by structural OCT, between the sites treated with crisaborole (2%) ointment and betamethasone valerate (0.1%) cream.
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 57
Analysis of Change in Objective Erythema
Analysis of the difference in the change in skin redness/erythema (relating to tolerability) during and after 28 days treatment determined by Mexameter measured on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57. The Mexameter device has a range of 0-999AU (arbitrary units) and the lower the value, the better the condition of the skin. Objective redness can be classified using the following scale: 0-170AU - No erythema; 170-330AU - Minimal erythema; 330-450AU - Diffuse erythema; 450-570AU - High erythema; over 570AU - Extreme erythema
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57
TEWL - Skin Barrier Function
Analysis of the change in Trans-Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL, relates to skin barrier function) during and after treatment. TEWL measurements on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and Day 57
TEWL - After Tape-stripping
The difference in skin barrier integrity (TEWLts20) after 28 days treatment. TEWL measurements after tape-stripping (TEWLts20) on day 29
Time frame: on Day 29, after 28 days treatment
Comparison of TEWL - After Tape-stripping
The difference in skin barrier integrity (TEWLts20) after 28 days treatment. TEWL measurements after tape-stripping (TEWLts20) on day 29
Time frame: on Day 29, after 28 days treatment
Skin Dryness
The difference in the change in visual skin dryness during and after treatment. Visual skin dryness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57. Visual skin dryness was scored using the following: 0 - Absent; 1 - Faint scaling, faint roughness and dull appearance; 2 - Small scales in combination with a few larger scales, slight roughness, whitish appearance; 3 - Small and larger scales uniformly distributed, definite roughness, possibly slight redness and possibly a few superficial cracks; 4 - Dominated by large scales, advanced roughness, redness present, eczematous changes and cracks. The lower the visual dryness score, the better the condition of the skin.
Time frame: Visual skin dryness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57
Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF)
The difference in Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF, filaggrin breakdown products) levels at the end of treatment. 3 NMF components were measured: Urocanic acid (UCA), Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA) and Free amino acids (FAA) and are expressed together as total NMF (tNMF).
Time frame: Day 29
Comparison of Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF) Between Treatments
The difference in Natural Moisturising Factor (NMF, filaggrin breakdown products) levels at the end of treatment. 3 NMF components were measured: Urocanic acid (UCA), Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid (PCA) and Free amino acids (FAA) and are expressed together as total NMF (tNMF).
Time frame: Day 29
Change in Visual Redness/Erythema During and After 28 Days Treatment
The difference in the change in visual skin redness during and after treatment. Visual skin redness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57 by an experienced grader. Visual skin redness was scored using the following: 0 - No redness; 0.5/+ - Slight patchy erythema, barely perceptible; 1 - Slight uniform erythema, mild erythema; 2 - Moderate uniform erythema, moderate erythema; 3 - Strong erythema, marked erythema. The higher the visual redness score, the more inflamed the skin looks to the naked eye.
Time frame: Visual skin redness scored on day 1, day 15, day 29 and day 57
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.