Multi-center, prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate outcomes of surgically treated patients with adult cervical spinal deformity.
Adult cervical deformity (ACD) is an uncommon but potentially severely debilitating condition with a broad range of causes that include but are not limited to spondylosis, inflammatory arthropathy, trauma, infection, iatrogenic, neoplastic, congenital, and neuromuscular processes. In general, sagittal plane deformities typically produce kyphosis, and coronal plane deformities result in scoliosis. Cervical kyphotic deformities are most commonly encountered in the setting of prior surgical destabilization, while cervical scoliosis is most commonly associated with congenital and neuromuscular conditions. Cervical kyphosis may be progressive and can result in neurological symptoms, including myelopathy. The most severe forms, such as those associated with spondylotic arthropathies, can produce "chin-on-chest" deformity, which can compromise horizontal gaze, swallowing, and breathing. Even in the absence of these conditions, cervical deformity is often associated with pain and functional disability. For adult thoracolumbar deformities, substantial efforts have been made to characterize clinical presentations, develop standardized classification systems, define optimal treatment approaches, describes operative complication rates, and to present structured clinical outcomes. However, despite the potential for profound impact of cervical deformity on function and health-related quality of life, there remains a remarkable paucity of high-quality studies that address these complex conditions. Health professionals providing nonoperative and surgical care for these patients are left to make important treatment decisions based on a combination of personal experience, anecdotal experience of colleagues and experts, and relatively small, often single-surgeon or single-center, retrospective case reports or case series in the literature. Recent systematic reviews have high-lighted the lack of studies relevant to cervical deformity and have failed to identify any prospective studies. The International Spine Study Group (ISSG) consists of orthopedic and neurological spine surgeons with a practice emphasis on spinal deformity patients. These surgeons, from 12 busy surgical centers, meet regularly to design and perform clinical research focused on spinal deformity, including successful prospective enrollment of more than 1,000 adult thoracolumbar deformity patients into the ISSG database. This group has a proven track record and regularly presents a substantial number of abstracts to the major spine meetings and has an extensive publication record. The ISSG members have currently enrolled more than 150 patients into the first generation prospective cervical deformity database and have produced approximately 50 abstracts and more than 25 manuscripts to date with the resulting data. The group has learned extensively from this first-generation database, but there is much yet to learn, as the literature remains relatively sparse on the topic of adult cervical deformity. Based on what we have learned from the first generation database; we have substantially modified the inclusion criteria for this second generation database. In addition, several new outcomes measures and functional assessments will be collected at baseline and follow-up intervals as part of this current proposal. The resources of the ISSG offer an unprecedented opportunity to create a prospectively collected multicenter database of cervical deformity patients that includes standardized health-related quality of life measures at baseline and regular follow-up, clinical and surgical parameters, and complications. The database and questionnaires have been carefully redesigned based on what we have learned in order to better collect data that will help to clarify many of the unresolved issues that are important for the care of cervical deformity patients. This project has substantial potential to significantly impact the field of cervical deformity and the care of deformity patients beyond what we have already been able to accomplish based on the first generation cervical deformity database. Herein we propose the second iteration for this project that promises to further advance our evolving understanding of these complex deformities.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Surgical interventions will be patient specified by treating surgeon.
Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic
La Jolla, California, United States
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Headaches
Self-reported pain in Head where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Neck
Self-reported pain in Neck where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Upper extremity
Self-reported pain in Arms where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Lower extremity
Self-reported pain in Legs where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Back
Self-reported pain in Back where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Patient reported neck disability tool
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)
Patient reported outcome
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Anxiety
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of California Davis, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
Sacramento, California, United States
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGUniversity of California-San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
RECRUITINGDenver International Spine Center, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children and Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, United States
RECRUITINGRush University, Department of Neurosurgery
Chicago, Illinois, United States
WITHDRAWNUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
RECRUITINGLeatherman Spine Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
RECRUITINGJohns Hopkins University, Department of Neurological Surgery
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of Michigan, Department of Neurosurgery
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
COMPLETEDHospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
New York, New York, United States
RECRUITING...and 6 more locations
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Pain Interference
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (Role)
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (DSA)
Computer adaptive PROs
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Spine Radiographs
Radiographic parameters (Cervical lordosis, Kyphosis, Scoliosis; Global balance in coronal and sagittal planes of the spine; pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, tilt, slope) and bony fusion status.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (mJOA)
Patient reported outcome measuring functional status using scale of 0 to 18. The higher the score, the less disability.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
EAT-10
Measures swallowing difficulties as reported by the patient.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10)
Measures voice handicap as reported by the patient.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Adverse evnts
Any adverse events occurring \& meeting study established reporting criteria
Time frame: 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year post treatment
Edmonton Frail Scale
Frailty scale from 0 to 17 where the higher the score the more frail the patient
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
CHSF Frail Scale
Clinical Frailty Scale from 1 to 9 where the higher the score, the more frail the patient
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Dynamometer Hand Grip Strength test
With patient seated, patient will squeeze dynamometer as hard as he/she can with each hand.
Time frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up