Going back home following a stroke is a key step for the patient and his or her relatives. Due to the brutality of stroke and increasingly shorter in-hospital lengths of stay, patients and their families must adapt quickly to the patient's new health functioning and the new caregiving and support role for family members. Peer support could be an innovative and inexpensive approach to addressing these issues. Peer-helpers are patient-partners who put their experiential knowledge from life with the disease at the disposal of other patients to offer them social and emotional support in the management of the disease in connection with care, social and community structures. Group peer support programs face organizational challenges and fail to address the full range of patient needs for stroke home visits. Individualized and more flexible support could better meet the needs of patients. Our hypothesis is that individual peer support improves quality of life and patient empowerment during the discharge period compared to usual practice.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
The intervention studied is the psycho-social support by a peer-helper to the patients and their main informal caregiver during the return home following a stay in rehabilitation center for a stroke. Peer support intervention will be based on evidence, Bandura's social learning and social support theory, and the results of our ongoing study of the needs of patients and their caregivers as a result of returning home (Stroke69). It will include a meeting before the discharge and a regular follow-up for 6 months (face-to-face meetings, virtual or by phone), adapted to the needs of the patient and his caregiver, taking into account the social environment and in connection with the devices existing sanitary and social.
Hôpital Henry Gabrielle
Saint-Genis-Laval, France
RECRUITINGFeasibility measure
The feasibility of the intervention will be evaluated as success with a combined criteria including: * Recruitment and training of 2 peer helpers, * Support offered to 20 patients by the peer helpers during the intervention period defined by at least one meeting before and one contact after discharge per patient included in period after, * Good acceptability by patients, carers and peer helpers. These data will be collected by a qualitative approach associating semi-directive interviews, focus groups and participant observation.
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months
Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: force dimension
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months
Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: manual function
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months
Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: AVQ/AVD
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months
Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: Mobility
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months
Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: Communication and Emotions
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months
Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: Memory and thinking
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months
Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: global recovery
Time frame: 6 months
Anxiety and depression scores between discharge and 6 months
Evolution of anxiety and depression scores between discharge and 6 months after discharge, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) score
Time frame: 6 months
Patient activation Measure
Evolution of patient activation between discharge and 6 months after discharge, measured by the Patient activation Measure (PAM) score
Time frame: 6 months
Disability
proportion of patients with disabilities at 6 months evaluated by the Modified Rankin Scale (no disability corresponding to mRs\<3)
Time frame: 6 months
Adherence
proportion of adherent patients at 6 months evaluated by the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)
Time frame: 6 months
Human, material and financial assistance provided at home
Human, material and financial assistance provided at home collected by interviewing the patient
Time frame: 6 months
Satisfaction measure
Perceived satisfaction of the support received on during the discharge period will be collected by interviewing the patient
Time frame: 6 months
Caregiver burden
Evolution of caregiver burden between discharge and 6 months after discharge, measured by the Zarit burden scale
Time frame: 6 months
Caregiver satisfaction
Perceived caregiver satisfaction of the support during the patient's discharge period will be collected by interviewing caregiver
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.