Detecting Occult HBV Infection in Liver Donors Positive for Antibody to Hepatitis B Core Antigen (Anti-HBc)

Overview

After LT, long-term immunosuppressive therapy is required to prevent organ rejection. Therefore, for organs which may harbour OBI, there is a risk of reactivation which may result in liver graft failure. As a consequence, all patients who receive an anti-HBc positive graft will receive antiviral prophylaxis. Currently, all such patients will be commenced on life-long entecavir, which is highly effective in preventing reactivation.2 One major disadvantage of using such a blanket approach is that a significant proportion of anti-HBc donors may not actually have underlying occult HBV infection, and recipients of such grafts may not require lifelong antiviral therapy. Current markers such as HBsAg and HBV DNA are not sensitive enough to detect the presence of OBI. This is the first trial proposed to look at the efficacy of these novel HBV biomarkers in identifying occult HBV infection when used in combination, and to identify patients who will not need long term antiviral prophylaxis.

Liver transplantation (LT) is potential curative for those with liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma. In Hong Kong, where HBV infection remains endemic, chronic HBV (CHB) infection remains the leading indication for LT. Due to the low rate of organ donation, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative donors who are anti-HBc positive are frequently used. There is potential for anti-HBc positive donors to harbor OBI, defined as the presence of liver and/or serum HBV DNA without serological evidence of chronic infection (HBsAg negative).1 Hence, there is a risk of transmitting HBV infection when these grafts are transplanted to HBsAg negative recipients (de novo HBV infection). Nonetheless, anti-HBc positive donors represent an important source of organs in HBV endemic area, including Hong Kong, with a high prevalence rate (37%) of HBsAg negative but anti-HBc positive population. After LT, long-term immunosuppressive therapy is required to prevent organ rejection. Therefore, for organs which may harbour OBI, there is a risk of reactivation which may result in liver graft failure. As a consequence, all patients who receive an anti-HBc positive graft will receive antiviral prophylaxis. Currently, all such patients will be commenced on life-long entecavir, which is highly effective in preventing reactivation.2 One major disadvantage of using such a blanket approach is that a significant proportion of anti-HBc donors may not actually have underlying occult HBV infection, and recipients of such grafts may not require lifelong antiviral therapy. Current markers such as HBsAg and HBV DNA are not sensitive enough to detect the presence of OBI. More recently a panel of novel HBV biomarkers have emerged.3,4 These include quantification of anti-HBc, HBV RNA, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels. Some of these markers have been associated with OBI, and may predict HBV reactivation for immunosuppressed patients.5,6 This is the first trial proposed to look at the efficacy of these novel HBV biomarkers in identifying occult HBV infection when used in combination, and to identify patients who will not need long term antiviral prophylaxis