The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of 2 fixed doses of tavapadon and placebo in participants with early PD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
529
Participants will be randomized to receive tavapadon 5mg tablet once daily orally for 27 weeks.
Participants will receive placebo matching to tavapadon QD orally for 27 weeks.
Participants will be randomized to receive tavapadon 15mg tablet once daily orally for 27 weeks.
Change From Baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III Combined Score
The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) rating tool was used to follow longitudinal course of Parkinson's Disease. It was made up of 4 parts: Part 1: Non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 2: Motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 3: Motor examination (18 items. Score range: 0-132); Part 4: Motor complications (6 items. Score range: 0-24. Part 4 was not collected in this trial). Each item has 0-4 rating on scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher values represent a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement in motor function. Parts 2 and 3 combined is the sum of Part 2 score and Part 3 score at each assessment time for each participant. The combined score assesses 31 items with score range: 0-184.
Time frame: Week 26
Change From Baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Part II Score
The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) rating tool was used to follow longitudinal course of Parkinson's Disease. It was made up of 4 parts: Part 1: Non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 2: Motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 3: Motor examination (18 items. Score range: 0-132); Part 4: Motor complications (6 items. Score range: 0-24. Part 4 was not collected in this trial). Each item has 0-4 rating on scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher values represent a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement in motor function.
Time frame: Week 26
Percentage of Responders With a Score of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on PGIC
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a 7-point response scale. The participant response to the question, "Compared to your condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your condition changed?" was assessed. Scores ranged from 1-7 on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Birmingham, Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Little Rock, Arkansas
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Fountain Valley, California
Fountain Valley, California, United States
Los Angeles, California
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pasadena, California
Pasadena, California, United States
Englewood, Colorado
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Adventura, Florida
Adventura, Florida, United States
Boca Raton, Florida
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Augusta, Georgia
Augusta, Georgia, United States
...and 67 more locations
Time frame: Week 26
Change From Baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III Combined Score
The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) rating tool was used to follow longitudinal course of Parkinson's Disease. It was made up of 4 parts: Part 1: Non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 2: Motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 3: Motor examination (18 items. Score range: 0-132); Part 4: Motor complications (6 items. Score range: 0-24. Part 4 was not collected in this trial). Each item has 0-4 rating on scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher values represent a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement in motor function. Parts 2 and 3 combined is the sum of Part 2 score and Part 3 score at each assessment time for each participant. The combined score assesses 31 items with score range: 0-184.
Time frame: Week 5, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 27
Change From Baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Parts I, II and III Combined Score
The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) rating tool was used to follow longitudinal course of Parkinson's Disease. It was made up of 4 parts: Part 1: Non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 2: Motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 3: Motor examination (18 items. Score range: 0-132); Part 4: Motor complications (6 items. Score range: 0-24. Part 4 was not collected in this trial). Each item has 0-4 rating on scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher values represent a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement in motor function. Parts 1, 2, and 3 combined is the sum of Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 scores at each assessment time for each participant. The combined score assesses 44 items with score range: 0-236.
Time frame: Week 5, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 27
Change From Baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Parts I, II and III Individual Score
The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) rating tool was used to follow longitudinal course of Parkinson's Disease. It was made up of 4 parts: Part 1: Non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 2: Motor aspects of experiences of daily living (13 items. Score range: 0-52); Part 3: Motor examination (18 items. Score range: 0-132); Part 4: Motor complications (6 items. Score range: 0-24. Part 4 was not collected in this trial). Each item has 0-4 rating on scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher values represent a worse outcome. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement in motor function.
Time frame: Week 5, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 27
Change From Baseline in the CGI-S Score
The Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score is a clinician's impression of a participant's severity of illness on a 7-point scale. Scores ranged from 1-7 on a scale of 1 (normal) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time frame: Week 5, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 27
Change From Baseline in the CGI-I Score
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score is a clinician's impression of how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to the baseline on a 7-point scale. Scores ranged from 1-7 on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time frame: Week 5, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 27
Change From Baseline in the PGIC Score
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a 7-point response scale. The participant response to the question, "Compared to your condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your condition changed?" was assessed. Scores ranged from 1-7 on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time frame: Week 5, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 27
Change From Baseline in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
The ESS is an 8-question, participant questionnaire that is intended to measure daytime sleepiness. It assesses the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in the following common situations: sitting and reading, sitting inactive in a public place as a passenger in a car for an hour or more without stopping for a break, lying down to rest when circumstances permit, sitting and talking to someone, sitting quietly after a meal without alcohol, and in a car while stopped for a few minutes in traffic or at a light. Each situation is rated on a 4-point (0-3) scale with scores ranging from 0 (would never nod off) to 3 (high chance of nodding off). Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Time frame: Week 26
Change From Baseline in the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease-Rating Scale (QUIP-RS)
QUIP-RS is a questionnaire for impulse-compulsive disorders in Parkinson's disease rating scale to assess impulse control disorders (ICD). The QUIP-RS has 4 primary questions that pertain to commonly reported thoughts, urges/desires, and behaviors associated with ICDs, each of which is applied to 4 ICDs (compulsive gambling, buying, eating, sexual behavior) and 3 related disorders (medication use, punding, and hobbyism). The QUIP-RS uses a 5-point Likert scale (score 0-4 \[0 means "never" and 4 means "very often"\] for each question) to gauge the frequency of behaviors. Scores for each ICD and related disorder range from 0 to 16, with a higher score indicating greater severity (frequency) of symptoms. The total QUIP-RS score for all ICDs and related disorders combined ranges from 0 to 112. A higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.
Time frame: Week 26
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
The C-SSRS is a systematically administered instrument developed to track suicidal adverse events across a treatment study. The instrument is designed to assess suicidal behavior and ideation, track and assess all suicidal events, as well as the lethality of attempts. Suicidal ideation (SI) categories include the following: wish to be dead; nonspecific active suicidal thoughts; active suicidal ideation without intent to act; active suicidal ideation with some intent to act but no plan; active suicidal ideation with plan and intent. Suicidal behavior categories include the following: actual attempt; interrupted attempt; aborted attempt; preparatory acts or behavior; suicidal behavior; completed suicide.
Time frame: Week 27
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until 190 days following last dose of study drug.