The aim of this multicentre, actively controlled, randomized, open label, parallel group, prospective, comparator study is to collect data on the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of the medical device ERS09 compared to a well-established comparator spray in the symptomatic treatment of sore throat due to acute pharyngitis and dry cough.
The aim of this study is to collect data on the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of Ectoin® Mouth and Throat Spray Althaea Honey (ERS09) compared to the well-established comparator spray EMSER® Hals- und Rachenspray (both medical devices) in the symptomatic treatment of sore throat due to acute pharyngitis and dry cough. The principle mode of action of ectoine is based on the physical interaction of the compatible solute with water and the resulting stabilizing effects of the ectoine hydro complex on the epithelial tissue treated. Althaea has so-called mucilaginous effects, that means generally a shielding of the irritated mucus membranes by thin polysaccharide layers. Such mucilaginous polymer layers lead to rehydration, coating of peripheral sensory receptors, and therefore to a reduction of throat irritation and dry coughing. Honey acts predominantly as demulcent with its viscous liquid constitution based on mainly fructose and glucose. The combination of all three substances may result in a multi-modal treatment of the symptoms of sore throat and dry cough. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the following treatment groups: * treatment with ERS09 * treatment with comparator (EMSER® Hals- und Rachenspray) Patients' symptoms will be documented by the physician in investigator questionnaires at visits 1, 2 and 3. At visit 1 the patients will receive a patient diary for daily documentation of their symptoms. In addition, patients and investigators will be asked to evaluate the overall effectiveness and tolerability of ERS09 spray at visit 3.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
194
4 puffs to be administered as needed several times a day for patients aged ≥ 12 years. A maximum of 10 applications per day should not be exceeded.
1 to 3 puffs to be administered several times a day
Dr. Pasch
Aachen, Germany
Dr. Sondermann
Aachen, Germany
Dr. Männer
Arnsberg, Germany
Dr. Kienle-Gogolok
Bad Schönborn, Germany
Change of mean total symptom score
Baseline adjusted mean change of patient's assessment of total symptom score (patient diary) averaged over 7 treatment days
Time frame: 7 days
Change of daily symptom score
Baseline adjusted daily change of patient's assessment of total symptom score (patient diary)
Time frame: 1 day
Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) during treatment phase
Evaluation of severity, nature and frequency of AEs/SAEs and their relationship to the investigational devices
Time frame: 7 +/- 2 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dr. Ginko
Bonn, Germany
Dr. Vent
Cologne, Germany
Praxis für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde
Dresden, Germany
Dr. Thieme
Duisburg, Germany
Dr. Horn
Heidelberg, Germany
Dr. Lenzenhuber
Jülich, Germany
...and 2 more locations