In the present trial, the StethoMe electronic stethoscope will be used for pulmonary auscultation and recording of lung sounds in the pediatric study population.
Multicenter, international - 2 EU sites (max. 1 in Poland) and a single US site. Trial centers and investigators will be identified and selected based on their clinical and research experience. The trial objective is to assess whether use of the StethoMe AI lung sounds analysis software provides clinical benefit by improving the identification of abnormal lung sounds in the categories of wheezes, rhonchi, fine crackles and coarse as compared to pulmonary auscultation by experienced physicians (general practitioners (GPs) and pulmonologists). The recordings will be used to form a gold standard database of lung sounds as evaluated by an expert, independent panel according to the study protocol. The gold standard database will include approximately equal representation of wheezes, rhonchi, fine crackles and coarse crackles. Moreover, the database will also include recordings without any of the previous descripted pathological sounds. The results of these two analyses, by traditional physician listening and by the StethoMe AI software application, will be assessed for sensitivity and specificity to the gold standard database in detection of the four lung sounds and recordings without defined pathological sounds. The StethoMe AI will be considered to provide clinical benefit if it demonstrates statistically better sensitivity or specificity on any of the four lung sounds as compared to the traditional physician auscultation, together with F1 score analysis.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
84
Assessing whether use of the StethoMe AI lung sounds analysis software provides clinical benefit by improving the identification of abnormal lung sounds.
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of wheezes by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of rhonchi by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of coarse crackles by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of fine crackles by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of wheezes by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of rhonchi by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of coarse crackles by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of fine crackles by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of wheezes by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of rhonchi by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of coarse crackles by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of fine crackles by StethoMe AI algorithms in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of wheezes by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of rhonchi by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of coarse crackles by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of fine crackles by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of wheezes by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of rhonchi by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of coarse crackles by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of fine crackles by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of wheezes by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of rhonchi by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of coarse crackles by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of fine crackles by pulmonologists in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of wheezes by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of rhonchi by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of coarse crackles by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Sensitivity for detection of fine crackles by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of wheezes by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of rhonchi by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of coarse crackles by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
Specificity for detection of fine crackles by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of wheezes by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of rhonchi by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of coarse crackles by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
F1 score for detection of fine crackles by general practitioners in comparison to gold standard
Time frame: 24 hours
Collecting pulmonary auscultation recordings
\- Possibility to perform pulmonary auscultation by physician by using study device with dedicated application, defined as a percentage of enrolled patients in whom the pulmonary auscultation was performed.
Time frame: 24 hours