This study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of an oropharyngeal exercise (O-PE) regimen in treating post-stroke obstructive sleep apnea, as an alternative therapy to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Eligible patients will be randomized (1:1) to treatment using a pre-specified schedule of O-PEs vs. a sham control arm.
BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent obstruction of the upper airway during sleep due to intermittent loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle tone. OSA is both a risk factor for stroke, as well as a common post-stroke co-morbidity with approximately 72% of patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) having OSA. Post-stroke OSA is linked to post-stroke, fatigue, which is a top research priority for stroke patients. Moreover, post-stroke OSA is associated with greater mortality, a higher risk of recurrent stroke, poorer cognition and lower functional status. In addition, stroke patients with OSA spend significantly longer times in rehabilitation and in acute care hospitals. Since OSA has a significant impact on the health of stroke patients, it is imperative that effective treatments are used to assist patients. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe OSA. However, despite having been demonstrated to improve post-stroke cognition, motor and functional outcomes,and overall quality of life, rates of CPAP adherence are low. Reasons for poor post-stroke CPAP adherence are multi-factorial and often not easily modifiable. Overall, there is a major clinical need to develop an alternative effective and well-tolerated treatment for OSA. Oro-pharyngeal exercises (O-PEs) are commonly used by speech-language pathologists to improve oro-motor strength and range of motion and serve as a promising alternative approach to treat OSA. For example, in a randomized controlled trial in which patients with moderate OSA underwent 3 months of daily exercises focusing on strengthening oro-pharyngeal musculature, OSA severity and symptoms were demonstrated to be significantly reduced compared to sham exercises.Similarly, use of the didgeridoo, a wind instrument that strengthens muscles of the upper airway, has also been demonstrated to reduce OSA severity. METHODS Research Question: Is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an O-PE regimen in post-stroke OSA feasible? Primary Objective: To examine whether an RCT of an O-PE regimen is feasible in stroke patients with OSA who are unable to tolerate CPAP. (i) The O-PE regimen will be considered feasible if \>80% of enrolled patients complete \>80% of the study exercises. (ii) We will also track the monthly number of eligible vs. recruited patients from Dr. Boulos' stroke and sleep disorders clinic. Hypothesis: An RCT of an O-PE regimen in post-stroke OSA will be feasible in that \>80% of enrolled patients will complete \>80% of the study exercises. Secondary Objectives: To explore whether an O-PE regimen, compared to sham activities, might be effective in (i) improving various objective sleep metrics (i.e. OSA severity and nocturnal oxygen saturation), (ii) improving various measures of oropharyngeal physiology and function (i.e. oro-pharyngeal deficits and dysarthria, tongue/lip/jaw weakness, and oro-facial kinematics), and (iii) enhancing self-reported sleep-related symptoms. Hypothesis: Compared to the sham activities, O-PEs will positively influence the outcomes noted above.
Oro-pharyngeal exercises that improve oro-pharyngeal and tongue strength. Instructions will be delivered via a tablet-based app.
Simple mouth movements that have no impact of oro-pharyngeal strength. Instructions will be delivered via a tablet-based app.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Percentage of enrolled participants completing >80% of the study exercises
The study exercise regimen will be deemed feasible if \>80% of enrolled patients complete \>80% of the study exercises. Patient adherence with study exercises in both treatment arms will be recorded (in minutes) via use of the App that will deliver the oropharyngeal exercises/sham exercises. Completion of \>80% of the study exercises would be indicated by \>720 recorded minutes (if post-training visit is after 6 weeks) or \>1200 recorded minutes (if post-training visit is after 10 weeks).
Time frame: 6-10 weeks (post-training)
OSA severity (as measured by the apnea-hypopnea index)
Measured by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). AHI quantifies the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep. It will be measured using a home sleep monitor that has been validated for use in the stroke population.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Lowest oxygen desaturation
Lowest oxygen desaturation will be measured using a home sleep monitor that has been validated for use in the stroke population.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Oro-pharyngeal deficits and dysarthria (as measured by the second version of Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment)
The second version of Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (FDA-2) is divided into 7 sections: reflexes, respiration, lips, palate, laryngeal, tongue, and intelligibility, each containing several individual items. Each item is rated on a scale from "0" to "7", where "0" means normal for age, and "7" means unable to undertake task/movement/sound. The total score of the 7 sections will determine the severity of dysarthria.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Tongue/lip/jaw weakness
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
33
Measured by the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument \& Flexiforce (max pressure, endurance)
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Oro-facial kinematic capacity
Oro-facial kinematic capacity is defined by the range of facial motions (in mm) for lips and jaw, assessed during a standardized series of oro-motor tasks (e.g. Maximum mouth opening, syllable repetition)
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Functional status (as measured by Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire)
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) encompasses 5 subscales: activity level, vigilance, intimacy and sexual relationships, general productivity, social outcome. An average score is calculated for each subscale and the 5 subscales are totaled to produce a total score. Subscale scores range from 1-4 with total scores ranging from 5-20. Higher scores indicate better functional status.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Daytime sleepiness (as measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale)
Scores on Epworth Sleepiness Scale range from range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher average sleep propensity in daily life (daytime sleepiness).
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Fatigue (as measured by Fatigue Severity Scale)
Fatigue Severity Scale measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle. Scores range from 9 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue severity.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Quality of Life (as measured by Stroke Impact Scale)
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) assesses multidimensional stroke outcomes through 8 domains: strength (raw score range: 4-20), hand function (5-25), activities of daily living (score range 10-50), mobility (score range 9-45), communication (score range 7-35), emotion (score range 9-45), memory and thinking (score range: 7-35), and participation (8-40). Each domain is scored separately. For each domain, raw scores are transformed using the following formula: Transformed Scale = (Actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)\*100 / (Possible raw score range). Higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)
Cognitive ability (as measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test for detecting cognitive impairment. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive ability.
Time frame: Baseline, 6-10 weeks (post-training), and 10-14 weeks (retention)