The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of empirical posterior wall isolation (PWI), left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) and coronary sinus isolation (CSI) when compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone: * PVI alone, * PVI + PWI, * PVI + PWI + LAAEI, * PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSI.
The Posterior Wall and/or Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The PLEA Trial) is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study that has the overall goal of establishing the efficacy and safety of different ablation techniques for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. The PLEA trial is designed to test the hypothesis whether posterior wall isolation (PWI) with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), PWI plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) with PVI and PWI plus LAAEI plus coronary sinus isolation (CSI) with PVI is superior to the standard approach alone (i.e. PVI alone) in decreasing the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-atrial arrhythmia recurrences.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
124
Catheter ablation
Grandview Medical Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
MarinHealth Medical Center
Larkspur, California, United States
University of Colorado
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes and all-cause mortality after initial procedure
The primary effectiveness endpoint is defined as the freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (\> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)
Time frame: 12 months
A composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.
The primary safety endpoint is defined as a composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of peri-procedural and 12-month post procedural complications.
These complications include: ischemic stroke, pulmonary veins (PVs) stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury, phrenic nerve paralysis, rehospitalization, and death.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
AF/AT/AFL Burden
Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFL) burden at 12 months after single and redo procedures
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
All-cause mortality
Death from all causes will be assessed
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Atrial contractility
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
WakedMed Heart & Vascular
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute
Austin, Texas, United States
Baylor Heart Clinic
Houston, Texas, United States
...and 6 more locations
Myocardial strain will be used to assess atrial contractility after catheter ablation
Time frame: 6 months
Heart failure analysis
Primary outcome will be assessed base on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Cardiovascular hospitalizations
Cardiovascular hospitalization was characterized by the site principal investigator (PI) and reported as part of the hospitalization case report form.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 60 months
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
These times will be compared amongst groups
Time frame: Day of Procedure
Number of repeat procedures
Number of repeat procedures within 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Time frame: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness analysis
The CEA will examine the cost of health care resources and health outcomes from the ablation procedure to 1-year postoperatively. The costs will include all health care utilization during this time. Health care utilization, and associated costs, related to the patients' condition, the procedure and adverse events will be the basis of a sensitivity analysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Long-term follow-up at 24 and 60 months to evaluate freedom of documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality adjudicated by the Core Laboratory
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (\> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 24 and 60 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)
Time frame: 24 and 60 months
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after redo ablation procedure.
Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias recurrence (AF/atrial flutter \[AFL\]/atrial tachycardia \[AT\]) (episodes \>30 seconds on 12-lead ECG, event monitor, Zio patch, Holter or device interrogation) and all-cause mortality (patients who die before the 12-month assessment or who are too ill to undergo assessment of AF are considered not to have response to treatment) during the evaluation period at 12 months after redo-ablation procedures as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory.
Time frame: 12 months