The goal of this randomized phase II study is a formal comparison of radiotherapy versus trans-oral surgery as the primary treatment of HPV-negative patients with early-stage oropharyngeal carcinoma.
This study is designed as a randomized phase II study. Patients will be randomized between current standard of care treatment (Arm 1) vs. TOS (Arm 2) in a 1:1 ratio. Additionally, patients will be stratified according to T stage (T1 vs. T2); N stage (N0/1 vs. N2/3) The randomized phase II design is required for three reasons: 1. The randomization will provide an appropriate control group to serve as a comparator for the experimental arm. Historical or contemporaneous non-randomized controls would not be appropriate due to the multitude of biases that could be introduced by patient selection and other confounders. 2. A small sample size will allow for adequate power to assess for progression-free survival, and also an assessment of quality of life, overall survival and toxicity. 3. The results will allow for a decision as to whether a multi-institutional phase III trial is warranted, and inform the design of such a trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
68
Standard of Care: Radiation +/- Chemotherapy
Trans-Oral Surgery (TOS) + Neck Dissection (plus radiation, if required)
London Regional Cancer Program
London, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGDisease-Specific Survival
Time from randomization to death from cancer
Time frame: 5 years
Overall Survival
Time from randomization to death from any cause
Time frame: 5 years
Progression-Free Survival
Defined as time from randomization to death from any cause
Time frame: 5 years
Local-Regional Failure
Defined as time from randomization to first local-regional failure (analyzed as cumulative incidence function with death as competing event)
Time frame: 5 years
Distant Failure
Defined as time from randomization to first distant failure or metastasis (analyzed as cumulative incidence function with death as competing event)
Time frame: 5 years
Any Failure
Defined as time from randomization to first local-regional failure or distant failure, whichever occurs first (analyzed as cumulative incidence function with death as competing event)
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of Life
Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years follow up
Quality of Life
Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: EORTC QLQ-C30
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years follow up
Quality of Life
Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: H\&N35 scale
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years follow up
Quality of Life
Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10)
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years follow up
Quality of Life
Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII)
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years follow up
Quality of Life
Quality of Life using the following questionnaire: Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ)
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years follow up
Toxicity profile of both study arms using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) Version 4
To determine toxicity profile of both study arms using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) Version 4
Time frame: Randomization until 5 years follow up
Feeding tube rate at 1 year
Measure other functional measurements such as feeding tube rate at 1 year
Time frame: Baseline to 1 year post treatment
CTCAE Dysphagia Grade
Measure other functional measurements such as CTCAE Dysphagia grade
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years post treatment