The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared to placebo plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in participants with locally advanced cervical cancer. The primary hypotheses are that pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy is superior to placebo plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with respect to progression-free survival and overall survival. Once the study objectives have been met or the study has ended, participants will be discontinued from this study and will be enrolled in an extension study to continue protocol-defined assessments and treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
1,060
IV infusion
IV infusion
IV infusion
Given as a total radiotherapy dose of 80 Gy for volume-directed and 75 Gy for point-directed
Given as a total radiotherapy dose of 80 Gy for volume-directed and 75 Gy for point-directed
HonorHealth Research Institute - Biltmore ( Site 8009)
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
UCLA Hematology/Oncology - Westwood (Building 200 Suite 120) ( Site 0027)
Los Angeles, California, United States
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian ( Site 0038)
Newport Beach, California, United States
UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center ( Site 0017)
Sacramento, California, United States
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center and Hospital ( Site 0028)
Denver, Colorado, United States
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by the Investigator
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease progression, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. Unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The Kaplan-Meier nonparametric product limit method for censored data was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The Kaplan-Meier nonparametric product limit method for censored data was used to estimate OS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. Unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The Kaplan-Meier nonparametric product limit method for censored data was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 at Month 24 as Assessed by the Investigator
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease progression, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. Unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The percentage of participants with PFS as assessed by the investigator is presented.
Time frame: 24 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 at Month 24 as Assessed by BICR
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. Unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The percentage of participants with PFS as assessed by BICR is presented.
Time frame: 24 months
Overall Survival (OS) at Month 36
OS is the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier approach to estimate the OS rate at Month 36. The percentage of participants with OS at Month 36 is presented.
Time frame: 36 months
Complete Response (CR) Rate Per RECIST 1.1 at Week 12 as Assessed by the Investigator
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and also includes reduction of all nodal lesions to \<10mm) per RECIST 1.1, CR rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experienced a CR. The percentage of participants with CR per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator at Week 12 is presented.
Time frame: 12 weeks
CR Rate Per RECIST 1.1 at Week 12 as Assessed by BICR
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and also includes reduction of all nodal lesions to \<10mm) per RECIST 1.1, CR rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experienced a CR. The percentage of participants with CR per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR at Week 12 is presented.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by the Investigator
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and also includes reduction of all nodal lesions to \<10mm) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions and includes no unequivocal progression in non-target lesions) per RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
ORR Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and also includes reduction of all nodal lesions to \<10mm) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions and includes no unequivocal progression in non-target lesions) per RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 in Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Participants as Assessed by the Investigator
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease progression, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. Unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. PD-L1 positive participants have a combined positivity score (CPS) equal or greater than 1. The Kaplan-Meier nonparametric product limit method for censored data was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 in PD-L1 Positive Participants as Assessed by BICR
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered PD. Unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. PD-L1 positive participants have a CPS equal or greater than 1. The Kaplan-Meier nonparametric product limit method for censored data was used to estimate PFS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
OS in PD-L1 Positive Participants
OS is the time from randomization to death due to any cause. PD-L1 positive participants have a CPS equal or greater than 1. The Kaplan-Meier nonparametric product limit method for censored data was used to estimate OS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
PFS After Next-Line Treatment (PFS 2) Following Discontinuation of Study Treatment
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) on next-line treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator. PFS 2 is measured after next-line treatment following discontinuation of study treatment administration.
Time frame: Up to approximately 55 months
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that rates the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Global scores are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating improved health status. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 score will be presented.
Time frame: Baseline and week 36
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Function Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better quality of life. The change from baseline in physical function (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) score will be presented.
Time frame: Baseline and week 36
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Symptom Specific Scale for Cervical Cancer (EORTC QLQ-CX24) Score
The EORTC QLQ-CX24 is a questionnaire that rates the symptoms common to women with cervical cancer and evaluates the impact of disease and/or treatments. The 24 items use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) and are classified into 3 multi-item scales, 11 items with symptom experience, 3 items with body image, and 4 items with sexual/ vaginal functioning. The other items of the questionnaire are lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy, menopausal symptom, sexual worry, sexual activity, and sexual enjoyment. Total scores are linearly transformed and range from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (most severe symptoms). The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-CX24 score is presented, with negative scores representing an improvement from baseline and vice versa.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study treatment and irrespective of causality to study treatment.
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study treatment and irrespective of causality to study treatment.
Time frame: Up to 32 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Smilow Cancer Center at Yale-New Haven ( Site 0023)
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
AdventHealth Orlando-AdventHealth Medical Group Gynecological Oncology ( Site 0009)
Orlando, Florida, United States
Parkview Research Center at Parkview Regional Medical Center ( Site 0026)
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center ( Site 0015)
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center. ( Site 0031)
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
...and 166 more locations