Pilot multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 60 patients to demonstrate the feasibility of enrolling patients with high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD) into an RCT of bariatric surgery versus medical weight management (MWM).
STUDY OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of an RCT of bariatric surgery compared to MWM in patients with morbid obesity and high-risk CVD. If we can demonstrate that this trial is feasible, the next step would be to conduct a large-scale RCT to evaluate the efficacy of bariatric surgery for the reduction of cardiovascular complications in this patient population. STUDY AIMS: 1. To demonstrate that enrolment of high-risk CVD patients into a bariatric surgery RCT is feasible. 2. To show that it is feasible to perform bariatric surgery in \>80% of patients in the intervention arm within 30 days of randomization. 3. To obtain preliminary information on the perioperative risks of bariatric surgery in patients with high-risk CVD. STUDY HYPOTHESES Study enrollment will be feasible at a rate of at least 1.25 patients per centre per month. Timely delivery of the intervention is possible, with \>80% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery within 30 days of randomization. The rate of crossover between the control and intervention arms will be low at \<2.5% per year. 30-day mortality rates in the intervention group will be comparable to that of an age and gender matched cohort without CVD who had bariatric surgery at the 2 study sites during the study period. DESIGN The present study is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm feasibility RCT with blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE design) of bariatric surgery compared to MWM in patients with morbid obesity and high-risk CVD. Individuals who meet study eligibility criteria will be randomized in 1:1 fashion to bariatric surgery (intervention arm) or MWM (control arm). Bariatric surgery will consist of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy, performed at the discretion of the surgeon and according to local standards.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
Although there may be slight variation by centre, Gastric Bypass generally involves creation of a 30-50 cc stomach pouch, which is anastamosed with a Roux limb of jejunum 75-100 cm in length and a biliary limb of 20-30 cm in length. The operation creates a small gastric pouch, with nutrients bypassing the duodenum and proximal jejunum. Sleeve Gastrectomy involves decreasing the size of the stomach to approximately 15% of its original size by resecting a large portion of the stomach along the greater curvature.
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGRecruitment rate
Recruitment rate (target of 60 patients over 24 months or 1.25 patients per centre per month)
Time frame: 24 months (or when recruitment is complete)
Time to intervention administration
Target of bariatric surgery performed within 30 days of randomization in \>80%
Time frame: 30 days
Crossover rate
Crossover rate between control and intervention arm
Time frame: At study completion (an average of 1.5 years follow-up)
Change in weight at 1 year
Change in weight in kilograms at 1 year
Time frame: 12 months
Change in BMI at 1 year
BMI (kg/m\^2) will be calculated using weight in kg at 1 year, and height
Time frame: 12 months
Composite outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and hospitalization for heart failure (HF)
Composite outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure
Time frame: 12 months, and through study completion (an average of 1.5 years follow-up)
Change in percent excess weight loss (%) at 1 year
Excess weight loss is a standard outcome measure in obesity research. It is calculated as the percentage of excess body weight lost after surgery. Excess body weight (kg) is calculated as current weight (kg) minus ideal body weight (kg) for a given height. Ideal body weight (kg) is taken from standardized tables.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 months
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification at 1 year
NYHA Class is a standardized classification system for severity of heart failure symptoms, and ranges from class I to class IV, with IV being the most severe symptoms and class.
Time frame: 12 months
Change in 6-minute walk test distance (m) at 1 year
The 6 Minute Walk Test is an exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome. Longer distances indicate better performance.
Time frame: 12 months
Change in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire score at 1 year
The SF-36 is a measure of health-related quality-of-life. It includes eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health perceptions (5 items). Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
Time frame: 12 months
Change in EuroQuol (EQ-5D-5L) quality of life questionnaire score at 1 year
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring health status, which includes a descriptive system asking about 5 health dimensions as well as an evaluation of overall health status with a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels from which respondents choose one response: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The visual analogue scale asks individuals to mark their health status on the day of the interview on a 20 cm vertical scale with end points of 0 and 100. Zero corresponds to " the worst health you can imagine", and 100 corresponds to "the best health you can imagine".
Time frame: 12 months
Number of participants with new onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) at 1 year
Will determine the number of participants who receive a new clinical diagnosis of AF during the study follow-up.
Time frame: 12 months, and through study completion (an average of 1.5 years follow-up)