BCD-089 is the original therapeutic monoclonal antibody binding the alpha subunit of the IL-6 receptor. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of BCD-089 in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis resistant to monotherapy with methotrexate.
BCD-089-3/SOLAR is the international, multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical study. The main period of the study (Weeks 0-24) is blinded; study subjects will receive BCD-089/placebo. At Week 24 the study will become open-label and all patients will receive BCD-089 once a week for 4 weeks. At week 28 patients who achieved the RA remission at week 24 will be switched to BCD-089 Q2W dosing regimen and will receive it through Week 51. Patients who failed to achieve remission at week 24 will receive BCD-089 once a week through Week 51.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
154
Research Institute of Rheumotology
Moscow, Russia
ACR 20 response
The proportion of ACR 20 responders
Time frame: Week 12
Low disease activity
The proportion of patients with low disease activity according to DAS28-CRP(4) (\< 3,2)
Time frame: Week 24
Need for rescue therapy
The proportion of patients who required rescue therapy
Time frame: Week 12.
RA remission
The proportion of patients who achieved RA remission according to DAS28-CRP(4) (\< 2.6)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
RA remission
The proportion of patients who achieved RA remission according to CDAI (≤ 2.8)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
RA remission
The proportion of patients who achieved RA remission according to SDAI (≤ 3.3)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
Remission according to the ACR/EULAR 2011 criteria
The proportion of patients who achieved remission
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
ACR20 response
The proportion of ACR20 responders
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24
ACR50 response
The proportion of ACR50 responders
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
ACR70 response
The proportion of ACR70 responders
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
Low RA activity according to DAS28-ESR(4)
The proportion of patients who achieved low RA activity according to DAS28-ESR(4) (\< 3.2)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
Low RA activity according to CDAI
the proportion of patients who achieved low RA activity according to CDAI (≤ 10)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
Low RA activity according to SDAI
The proportion of patients who achieved low RA activity according to SDAI (≤ 11)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
Change in the DAS28-CRP(4)
The change from baseline in the DAS28-CRP(4)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
Change in the CDAI
The change from baseline in the CDAI
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
Change in the SDAI
The change from baseline in the SDAI
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
Moderate/good response according to the EULAR criteria
The proportion of patients with moderate/good response according to the EULAR criteria
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
Change in concentration of C-reactive protein
The change from baseline in the concentration of C-reactive protein in serum
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24.
Change in the ESR
The change from baseline in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24
Change in the quality of life measured with SF-36
The change from baseline in the patient's quality of life measured with the SF-36 score
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24
Change in the quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-3L
The change from baseline in the patient's quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-3L
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24
Change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) score
The change in the FACIT-F score. The level of fatigue is measured on a four point Likert scale (4 = not at all fatigued to 0 = very much fatigued) (Webster et al., 2003)
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24
Change in functional activity
The change in functional activity according to the HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire without Didability Index) score. The value of the HAQ-DI index can be interpreted in terms of three categories: from 0 to 1: mild difficulties to moderate disability, from 1 to 2: disability moderate to severe, from 2 to 3: severe to very severe disability.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24
X-ray assessment
The change in mTSS score according to Sharp/van der Heijde (SvH) scoring method
Time frame: Week 24