Pleural fluid can be caused by cancer. Patients with repeated presentation of pleural fluid where initial diagnostic tests have been inconclusive are the focus of this trial. In this clinical trial patients are randomized into two groups and the efficacy of local anesthetic thoracoscopy (LAT) is compared to an ultrasound guided biopsy of the outer lining of the lung. The aim is not only the diagnostic yield in diagnosing cancer, but also the procedures ability to diagnose specific cancer mutations and immune system markings. Methods and objectives: Patients with reoccuring one-sided pleural fluid, with a marked clinical risk of cancer based on findings in medical work-up, radiological scans, biochemistry and medical history and who are undiagnosed upon initial pleural fluid analysis are the target patients of the trial. Patients are randomized into two groups to have undertaken either pleural biopsy at the optimal site for a repeat thoracentesis or LAT. Thus diagnostic yield for both fluid analysis and biopsy analysis will be compared to tissue samples taken with LAT. We hypothesize that LAT is superior both to pleural biopsy and repeat thoracentesis in providing diagnostic clarification and providing sufficient basis for treatment without further procedures resulting in less time consumption, cost and discomfort for the patient.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
4
Procedure to obtain histological biopsies of the parietal pleura on awake, fastening patients.
In local anesthesia, a closed needle biopsy is performed Ultrasound guided of the parietal pleura at the place of deepest fluid recess in the intrathoracic space. A pigtail catheter French 7-16 is placed afterwards for fluid drainage.
Næstved Hospital
Næstved, Denmark
University Hospital Zealand, Roskilde
Roskilde, Denmark
Incidence of treatment-guiding pleural workup to provide and plan treatment for the cause of the pleura exudate, local anesthetic thoracoscopy vs 2. thoracentesis
Difference in incidence of treatment-guiding diagnostic workup in local anesthetic thoracoscopy versus 2nd thoracentesis
Time frame: 26 weeks
Incidence of treatment-guiding pleural workup to provide and plan treatment for the cause of the pleura exudate. Local anesthetic thoracoscopy vs US-guided pleural biopsy.
Difference in incidence of treatment-guiding diagnostic workup in local anesthetic thoracoscopy versus US-guided pleural biopsy prior to 2nd thoracentesis
Time frame: 26 weeks
Incidence of achieving pleural immunohistochemistry, mutations, oncodrivers, culture and biochemistry.
Time frame: 26 weeks
Incidence of completed procedures
Time frame: 1 week
Time from randomization to conclusive, treatment-guiding diagnoses
Time frame: 26 weeks
Time from start of consultation with medical staff until end of consultation with medical staff on the day of the procedure
Time frame: Day of procedure/intervention
Time from procedure start to patient leaving the procedure room and leaving the recovery room
Time frame: Day of procedure/intervention
Adverse event; complication to procedure: mortality
Evaluated on day of procedure, 7 days and 30 days. The 2 last are performed via telephone call to the patient and informations gathering in the electronic patient file system
Time frame: 30 days.
Adverse event; complication to procedure: pneumothorax
Evaluated on day of procedure, 7 days and 30 days. The 2 last are performed via telephone call to the patient and informations gathering in the electronic patient file system
Time frame: 30 days.
Adverse event; complication to procedure: haemoptysis
Evaluated on day of procedure, 7 days and 30 days. The 2 last are performed via telephone call to the patient and informations gathering in the electronic patient file system
Time frame: 30 days.
Adverse event; complication to procedure: infection
Evaluated on day of procedure, 7 days and 30 days. The 2 last are performed via telephone call to the patient and informations gathering in the electronic patient file system
Time frame: 30 days.
Adverse event; complication to procedure: hospital admission
Evaluated on day of procedure, 7 days and 30 days. The 2 last are performed via telephone call to the patient and informations gathering in the electronic patient file system
Time frame: 30 days.
Total volume of pleural fluid removed
In mililiter (ml)
Time frame: Day of procedure
Patient reported discomfort reported via ESAS
ESAS - Edmonton Symptom Assesment System, Danish Version 2008
Time frame: Day of procedure pre- and post-procedure and 1 week followup
Patient reported discomfort reported via EQ-5D-5L
Denmark (Danish) © 2009 EuroQol Group EQ-5D™
Time frame: Day of procedure pre- and post-proceudre and 1 week followup
Willingness to repeat procedure
5 Point Likert Scale, 1 not likely to repeat, 5 most likely to repeat
Time frame: After procedure performed - within 30 minutes and 1 week after proceudre
Cough
Visual analogue scale 1-10. 1 Being no cough, 10 being extreme cough
Time frame: Pre-procedure, 1 week post procedure.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.