Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Using Bipolar Vessel Sealer

Mansoura University52 enrolled

Overview

This study will be a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical performance and outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to non-descent vaginal hysterectomy ,using bipolar vessel sealer,in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding in Mansoura University Hospital in order to reach the optimum technique for our locality

Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of the uterus. It is the commonest major gynecological surgery, next to caesarean section, with millions of procedures performed annually throughout the world.Approximately 90% of hysterectomies are performed for benign conditions. Although there are many approaches to hysterectomy, which depend on clinical criteria, certain patients may be eligible to be operated in any of the several available approaches. The optimal route of hysterectomy for a patient will depend on the pathological nature, size and shape of the vagina and uterus, uterine descent, endometriosis and the likelihood of pelvic adhesions, adnexal masses, previous pelvic surgery, available hospital technology, devices and the surgeon's preference. Approaches to hysterectomy may be broadly categorized into four options: abdominal hysterectomy (AH); vaginal hysterectomy (VH); laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) where at least some of the operation is conducted laparoscopically and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RH).Vaginal and laparoscopic procedures are considered "minimally invasive" surgical approaches because they do not require a large abdominal incision and, thus, typically are associated with shortened hospitalization and postoperative recovery times compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. This study will be a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical performance and outcome of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to non-descent vaginal hysterectomy, using bipolar vessel sealer, in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding in order to reach the optimum technique with lower cost to be easily applied to low resource settings.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Uterine Bleeding

Interventions

Vaginal hysterectomyPROCEDURE

Vaginal hysterectomy by removal of uterus through vagina in absence of prolapse

Laparoscopic hysterectomyPROCEDURE

Laparoscopic hysterectomy through key hole surgery through small incisions of the abdomen

Eligibility

Sex: FEMALEMin age: 35 YearsMax age: 60 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Women assigned for performing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding due to benign pathology. * Uterine size by bimanual examination ≤14 weeks gestational size. * Cases with uterine volumes ≤ 400cm3 will be included in this study. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with BMI \> 30kg/m2 * Uteri \> 14 weeks gestational size by bimanual examination or volume \> 400cm3 * Women with positive pap smear for CIN or endometrial biopsy with atypia or carcinoma. * Patient with other known body malignancy. * Patient with other pelvic pathology, endometriosis or pelvic abscesses. * Patients with abdominal scars.

Locations (1)

Mansoura University Hospital

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Duration of operation

Time frame: From start of surgery up to 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes

Time of requiring analgesics

The time of the first request for analgesics

Time frame: Until 24 hours postoperatively

Number of requiring analgesics

The number of requests for analgesics

Time frame: Until 24 hours postoperatively

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.