The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftolozane-tazobactam is as effective as meropenem with respect to 30 day mortality in the treatment of bloodstream infection due to third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptible Enterobacterales or a known chromosomal AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp. or Serratia marcescens).
Enterobacterales are common causes of bacteraemia, and may produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) or AmpC beta-lactamases. ESBL or AmpC producers are typically resistant to third generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone, but susceptible to carbapenems. In no study has the outcome of treatment for serious infections for ESBL producers been significantly surpassed by carbapenems. Despite the potential advantages of carbapenems for treatment of ceftriaxone non-susceptible organisms, widespread use of carbapenems may cause selection pressure leading to carbapenem-resistant organisms. This is a significant issue since carbapenem-resistant organisms are treated with last-line antibiotics such as colistin. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a combination of a new beta-lactam antibiotic with an existing beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam, and is active against ESBL and most AmpC producing organisms. In a large sample of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales isolates from urinary tract and intra-abdominal specimens, ceftolozane-tazobactam was susceptible in over 80%. It has been FDA approved for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), and more recently for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). In addition, a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials has shown favourable clinical cure rates with ceftolozane-tazobactam for cUTI and cIAI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales. Given the issues of carbapenem resistant organisms, there is a need for establishing the efficacy of an alternative to carbapenems for serious infections.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Ceftolozane-tazobactam 3 grams (comprising ceftolozane 2 grams and tazobactam 1 gram) administered, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 60 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function.
Meropenem 1 gram, every 8 hours, three times a day, intravenously over 30 mins. Dose adjusted for renal function.
John Hunter Hospital
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Mortality rate at 30 days
To compare the 30-day mortality from day of randomisation of each regimen
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Mortality rate at 14 days
To compare the 14-day mortality from day of randomisation of each regimen
Time frame: 14 days post randomisation
Clinical and microbiological success
Defined as survival PLUS resolution of fever (temperature \<38 degrees Celsius) PLUS improved SOFA score (as compared to baseline) PLUS sterilisation of blood cultures at Day 5
Time frame: 5 days post randomisation
Functional bacteraemia score (FBS)
To compare the functional bacteraemia score of patients treated with each regimen at baseline and Day 30 (scored 0-7, higher scores equal better outcomes)
Time frame: 0 and 30 days post randomisation
Microbiological relapse
To compare the rates of relapse of bloodstream infection (microbiological failure) with each regimen at Day 30
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Rates of new bloodstream infection
To compare the rates of new bloodstream infection (growth of a new organism from blood cultures - not a contaminant as determined by treating clinician) with each regimen
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Length of in-patient hospital and ICU stay
To compare lengths of in-patient hospital and ICU stay with each regimen (not including in-patient rehabilitation, long term acute care or hospital in the home)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Royal Prince Alfred
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Woolongong Hospital
Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Monash Medical Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Dandenong Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
...and 19 more locations
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Serious adverse events
To compare the number of treatment emergent serious adverse events with each regimen
Time frame: Day 1 to last dose plus 24 hours of treatment:
Clostridioides difficile infection
To compare rates of Clostridioides difficile infection with each regimen
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Colonisation and/or infection with multi-resistant bacterial organisms
To compare rates of colonisation and/or infection with multi-resistant bacterial organisms (MROs) including those newly acquired
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation
Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with partial credit
To compare the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with partial credit with each regimen (scored 0-100, higher scores equal better outcomes)
Time frame: 30 days post randomisation