The purpose of this study is to compare two approaches for monitoring pancreatic cysts as well as to identify associated biomarkers. The study doctors want to compare more frequent monitoring versus less frequent monitoring as well as identify biomarkers which may improve risk detection of transformation to pancreatic cancer. The study doctors want to learn which monitoring method and which biomarkers lead to better outcomes for patients.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluate whether the protocol specified primary biomarkers (both blood and imaging-based) measured at baseline, are associated with the future development of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate whether the imaging-based secondary biomarker implemented using baseline computed tomography (CT) scans and/or the blood-based secondary biomarker panel, is associated with the future development of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata. II. Estimate area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive value of each biomarker. III. Evaluate the predictive ability of the longitudinal trajectory of each biomarker for prediction of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata. IV. Develop and evaluate risk scores that combine blood-based and imaging-based markers. V. Compare patient reported outcomes (PROs) between study arms (A and B): quality of life (QOL), financial distress, and situational anxiety. VI. Compare 5-year total cost between arms (A and B). PRIMARY OBJECTIVE (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024): I. To compare the rates of unfavorable clinical outcomes in the two arms. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024): I. To compare rates of major surgical morbidity and/or mortality between arms. II. To compare pancreatic cancer incidence and all-cause mortality across arms. III. Compare institutional (direct) costs. IV. Compare healthcare utilization of imaging, invasive testing, surgical, and other procedures across the two surveillance arms. V. Compare patient (out-of-pocket and other indirect) costs. VI. Describe diagnostic test and treatment pathways by arm. VII. Compare patient reports of QOL, situational anxiety. VIII. Compare patient report of financial distress. IX. Compare rates of non-adherence by arm assignment. X. To evaluate and compare the predictive performance of known and future biomarkers for dysplasia or cancer. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024): I. To evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of known and future radiomic markers for dysplasia and pancreatic cancer. OUTLINE: This is an observational study. Patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT scans as well as blood sample collection throughout the trial. Patients undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), fine needle aspiration (FNA), biopsy and surgery as clinically indicated. Patients are followed up every 6 months or yearly for 5 years from the date of registration. OUTLINE (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024): This is an observational study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM A (LOW INTENSITY SURVEILLANCE) (CLOSED TO ACCRUAL 08/13/2024): Patients undergo MRI, CT, or EUS at the beginning of the trial and MRI or CT again in 1 year. Following the first year, patients with no abnormalities repeat MRI or CT every 2 years. Patients with positive imaging features on MRI and CT at 1 or 2 years and with negative EUS, repeat MRI or CT in 1 year. Patients with negative imaging repeat MRI or CT in 2 years. ARM B (HIGH INTENSITY SURVEILLANCE) (CLOSED TO ACCRUAL 08/13/2024): Patients undergo MRI, CT, or EUS at the beginning of the trial. Patients with \>= 1 and \< 2 cm cyst undergo MRI or CT every 6 months for 1 year, then every 12 months for 2 years, and then every 24 months thereafter. Patients with \>= 2 and \< 3 cm cyst undergo EUS within 6 months, and if EUS is negative, patients repeat MRI or CT in 1 year. If second EUS is negative, patients undergo alternate MRI or CT and EUS every 12 months. Patients with cyst \>= 3 cm undergo alternate MRI or CT with EUS every 3-6 months. All patients may also optionally undergo blood sample collection, biopsy and/or EUS-FNA on study. After completion of imaging procedures, patients are followed up for 5 years from the date of registration.
Undergo biopsy
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo CT
Time-to-finding of a worrisome feature and/or high-risk stigmata on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Will assess the predictive performance of both primary markers separately. Time to first occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata will be measured from the time of baseline blood draw. Will use an overall significance level of 0.1. Will use a Bonferroni correction for multiplicity adjustment, the significance level applied to both primary biomarkers will be 0.05. Will evaluate using a two-sided log-rank test comparing time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata between the marker-positive and marker-negative subgroups. Will visually summarize time to occurrence of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata in both maker positive and marker negative using Kaplan-Meier curves. All biomarkers will come in with a predetermined threshold for determining marker positivity (as defined in their respective publications). The primary imaging marker is for MRI, the analysis of this biomarker will be restricted to participants with a pre-enrollment MRI.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Occurrence of an "unfavorable" outcome (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Defined as a composite of: (1) any pancreatic cancer without surgery; (2) unresectable pancreatic cancer or cancer \> T1a, N0 at surgery, and (3) benign disease at surgery will be approached from the intent-to-treat perspective. Time to the first occurrence of the primary endpoint will be measured from randomization. Survival analysis methods will be used to estimate and compare distributions of time to an unfavorable event between the study arms. In particular Kaplan-Meier estimates will be developed for each arm and a log rank test will be used to compare the two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Finding of a worrisome feature and/or high-risk stigmata on CT or MRI
Will evaluate with the analog analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Situational anxiety
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
770
Undergo EUS
Undergo EUS-FNA
Undergo MRI
Ancillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Ancillary studies (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Undergo surgery
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGUniversity of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute
Mobile, Alabama, United States
RECRUITINGAnchorage Associates in Radiation Medicine
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
RECRUITINGAnchorage Radiation Therapy Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDAlaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
RECRUITINGAlaska Oncology and Hematology LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
RECRUITINGAlaska Women's Cancer Care
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
RECRUITINGAnchorage Oncology Centre
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
SUSPENDEDKatmai Oncology Group
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
RECRUITINGProvidence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
RECRUITING...and 419 more locations
Will be measured using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety 4-item short form. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare situational anxiety between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall quality of life
Will be measured using the PROMIS-10. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. A hierarchical strategy will be used. Will compare quality of life between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Financial distress
Will be measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity measure. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. Will compare financial distress between arms with a two-sample unequal-variance t-test.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Cost
Will evaluate the sum of Medicare reimbursement for all the healthcare utilization. Will compare total cost between arms. The analysis group will be the patients recruited prior to the activation of addendum #5 and randomized to either high or low intensity surveillance. The distribution of the cost will be examined. If it is approximately normal, then the cost between the arms will be compared using a t-test. Also, the variance in the cost will be compared to assess if it differs between the arms. If distribution is particularly skewed a transformation will be sought, and the comparison will be analyzed on that scale.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Surgical and all-cause mortality (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Rates of major surgical morbidity and/or mortality will be estimated and compared across arms. All-cause mortality will be estimated and compared between the arms using log rank tests.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Major surgical morbidity (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Rates of major surgical morbidity and/or mortality will be estimated and compared across arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Pancreatic cancer incidence (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Pancreatic-cancer incidence and pancreatic cancer specific mortality will be estimated and compared between the arms using log rank tests.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Institutional (direct) costs (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will compare between two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Healthcare utilization of imaging, invasive testing, surgical, and other procedures (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will compare between two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Patient (out-of-pocket and other indirect) costs (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will compare between two arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Diagnostic test and treatment pathways (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will describe diagnostic test and treatment pathways by arm.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Patient reports of quality of life (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will be assessed by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System10. Will compare between arms. Longitudinal regression modelling will be completed to account for the repeated assessments over time.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Patient reports of situational anxiety (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will be assessed by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Anxiety short form. Will compare between arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Patient report of financial distress (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will compare between arms.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Rates of non-adherence (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will compare rates of non-adherence by arm assignment.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Biomarker analysis (PRIOR TO ADDENDUM #5 08/13/2024)
Will evaluate and compare the predictive performance of known and future biomarkers for dysplasia or cancer.
Time frame: Up to 5 years