Primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations the aesthetic performance, on the third middle and inferior of the face, of "MonoDermà HA Bio-revitalizing gel", an intradermal filler containing hyaluronic acid, combined to a low level laser therapy (LLLT) to obtain a stable photo-cross-linking effect inside the dermis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
24
Two intradermal injections of the filler were performed during the basal and after 1 month, on the middle and inferior third of the face (1ml for each face side) using a needle (30G). Immediately after both injection procedures, LLLT session were performed on the same face area for a total of 8 minutes, using three different wavelengths (450 nm, 650 nm and 1064 nm) simultaneously.
DERMING
Milan, MI, Italy
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade variation
Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where: Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature. Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched. Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; \<2mm visible fold when stretched. Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) grade variation
Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where: Grade 1: Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 2: An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3: Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 4: An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5: Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Photographic documentation (3D pictures)
Three-dimensional pictures of the face taken by VECTRA H1 handheld imaging system.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Face volume variation
Face volume image analysis was carried on the 3D pictures taken by Vectra H1 thanks to Vectra analysis module (VAM) software
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)