The treatment of uterine niche ranges from clinical management with expectant or pharmacological treatment, surgical treatment. Approaches for repair include Laparotomy, laparoscopy , hysteroscopy , vaginal. The decision to treat takes into consideration the size of the defect, presence of symptoms, secondary infertility and plans of pregnancy. All of the approaches have its merits and debates. There is ongoing debate regarding the best surgical approach to managing this condition. To date no randomized controlled trials have been published to settle this debate. Our study aim is to to evaluate which surgical approach is a preferable option, this study will be conducted to compare the Laparoscopic and transvaginal approaches in several regards, including, operation time, blood loss, perioperative complications, hospital stay length, postoperative increase in residual myometrial thickness during follow-up , clinical efficacy(percentage of patients who subject improvement of symptoms)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
Repair of uterine niche through Laparoscopic approach.
Repair of uterine niche through Transvaginal approach.
Abdulrahman Muhammad Rageh
Asyut, Egypt
RECRUITINGClinical efficacy
Number of patients who subject clinical improvement of pre-operative symptoms
Time frame: 3 month postoperative
Post-operative increase in residual myometrial thickness
difference between pre-operative \& post-operative residual myometrial thickness
Time frame: 3 month postoperative
Duration of operation
duration from anesthesia till end of operation
Time frame: baseline( During operation)
Blood loss
estimated blood loss during operation(towels , suction container)
Time frame: baseline( During operation)
Intra-operative complication
complication during the operation
Time frame: baseline( During operation)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.