The purpose of this study is to compare the endodontic outcomes of Bio-MA and ProRoot MTA in pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair, endodontic microsurgery.
The patients were recruited at the Endodontic clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Thailand. Each treatment was provided following the standard protocol. The calcium silicate based material (Bio-MA or ProRoot MTA) was randomly selected and used in the treatment. The patients were periodically recalled at 6 to 12 months. The outcome of the three treatments based on the clinical and radiographic criteria was assessed by the calibrated examiners and interpreted as ''healed/healing" or ''disease.''
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
60
Calcium silicate cement for using in endodontic treatments i.e. pulpotomy, orthograde MTA apical barrier, root perforation repair, and endodontic microsurgery.
Nuttida Tungsuksomboon
Bangkok, Thailand
RECRUITINGHealed rate
No clinical sign and symptoms and periapical area in radiograph is normal. Describe in percentage.
Time frame: At least 1 year recall
Healing rate
No clinical sign and symptoms and periapical lesion in radiograph is reduce in size. Describe in percentage.
Time frame: At least 1 year recall
Disease rate
Clinical sign and symptoms is present and/or periapical lesion in radiograph is unchange or enlarge. Describe in percentage.
Time frame: At least 1 year recall
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.