Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay of prostate cancer treatment to improve overall survival for intermediate- and high-risk localized disease as well as metastatic disease. While ADT improves survival, it can cause significant morbidity and a decrement in quality of life. In particular, ADT is associated with decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fracture. Although current guidelines recommend continuous androgen deprivation therapy (CAD) as standard therapy for high-risk disease, there has been increasing recognition of adverse effects from CAD. Since 1986, intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (IAD) as alternative therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer has been proposed to delay development of castration resistance and to reduce the side effects of ADT. While both CAD and IAD are commonly used in real clinical practice, no prior study examined BMD change after CAD or IAD, and assessed whether bone loss would recover during off-treatment of IAD. The investigators therefore determine the rate of change in BMD induced by ADT (CAD versus IAD) in men with prostate cancer.
Objective: To determine the rate of bone mass loss induced by two therapeutic strategies of ADT (CAD versus IAD) in men with prostate cancer. Design, setting, and participants: the investigators will perform randomized, open label clinical trial. Men aged over 50 yrs old with prostate cancer (localized, locally advanced, metastatic prostate cancer) who are treated with primary ADT for newly diagnosed prostate cancer or salvage ADT at biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following treatment arms: Arm 1 (CAD): ADT without any discontinuation during study period (12 months). Arm 2 (IAD): ADT for the first 6 months of study period, if the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reaches its nadir (\< 4 ng/dL) and serum testosterone reaches castration level (\< 50 ng/dL). Outcomes: Primary outcome: change of L-spine total BMD. Secondary outcomes: change of femur neck BMD, incidence rate of osteoporosis, risk of 10 year major osteoporotic fracture, quality of life based on Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) questionnaire. Timing of outcome measurement: at baseline and up to 12 months after randomization. Statistical analyses: student's t test for continuous outcomes and Fisher's exact or chi-square test for dichotomous outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
164
LHRH agonist
LHRH agonist
LHRH agonist
LHRH antagonist
Antiandrogen
Antiandrogen
Combination therapy with LHRH agonist and antiandrogen
Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University, College of Medicine
Cheongju-si, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine
Daegu, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Yeungnam University, College of Medicine
Daegu, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Eulji University, College of Medicine
Daejeon, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Konyang University, College of Medicine,
Daejeon, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University, School of Medicine
Gwangju, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Wonkwang University, School of Medicine
Iksan, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology,Jeonbuk National University Medical School
Jeonju, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Pusan National University, School of Medicine
Pusan, South Korea
RECRUITINGDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine
Wŏnju, South Korea
RECRUITINGChange of L-spine total BMD
Measured by bone densitometry
Time frame: At baseline and 12 months
Change of femur neck BMD
Measured by bone densitometry
Time frame: At baseline and 12 months
Osteoporosis
Defined as newly diagnosed osteoporosis based on T-score (≤ -2.5)
Time frame: At 12 months
Risk of 10 year major osteoporotic fracture
Estimated by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®, available at www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX)
Time frame: At 12 months
Quality of life after treatment
Measured by EPIC questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline and 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.