The E-TIPS trial will evaluate an evidence-based, telehealth pain self-management intervention compared to standard care (a waitlist) for chronic pain in adults with physical disabilities who are employed. Participants from anywhere in the US will be randomized to either E-TIPS, a cognitive-behavioral pain self-management intervention delivered by telephone, or a waitlist control. Outcomes, including pain interference, will be assessed at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 6-month follow up.
Chronic pain is one of the most prevalent, disabling, and persistent comorbid conditions associated with physical disabilities, including limb loss, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and chronic neurodegenerative conditions such as multiple sclerosis. One half to two-thirds of adults with these conditions experience chronic pain. In addition to being associated with disability, depression, sleep disruption, and physical inactivity, chronic pain has deleterious social and societal costs, including job loss and reliance on long-term disability programs. The E-TIPS intervention aims to address common barriers encountered by employed individuals with chronic pain. People with physical disabilities may be offered face-to-face delivery of pain self-management interventions, in clinical settings during business hours, which limits access to people with physical disabilities who are employed. These individuals must take time off work to attend multiple treatment sessions, overcome transportation difficulties, and contend with the stigma of seeking behavioral healthcare. Telehealth interventions, such as E-TIPS, have considerable potential for expanding the reach of pain self-management interventions for employed people with physical disabilities. The proposed randomized (1:1), single-blind parallel-group trial will compare the E-TIPS telehealth pain self-management intervention to a waitlist control in adults with physical disabilities and chronic pain who are employed. Outcomes will be assessed before randomization, mid-treatment (6 weeks post-randomization), post-treatment (10 weeks post-randomization; primary endpoint), and 6-month follow up (25 weeks post-randomization). Participants will be recruited from across the US, including at University of Washington (UW) and Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (SRALab).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
220
Chronic pain self-management strategies for employed individuals with physical disabilities
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Change in Pain Interference
Patient-reported pain interference using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Scale-6-item. Each item is scored 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), yielding a raw score between 6 and 30, which is converted to a standard t-score. The population mean is a score of 50, with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater self-reported pain interference.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 12 weeks (post-treatment)
Change in Pain Self-efficacy
Patient-reported pain self-efficacy for managing pain using the University of Washington Pain Self-Efficacy Scale-6 item. Each item is scored 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), yielding a raw score between 6 and 30, which is converted to a standard t-score.The population mean is a score of 50, with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater patient-reported self-efficacy for managing pain.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 12 weeks (post-treatment)
Change in Average Pain Intensity
0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale of average pain intensity in past week (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-reported pain intensity; range of 0 - 10.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 12 weeks (post-treatment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.