The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a peer-led, brief, behavioral intervention to improve adherence to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among low-income, minoritized individuals living with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Baltimore, Maryland. The intervention is based on behavioral activation (BA) and is specifically designed to be implemented by a trained peer recovery specialist. In this pilot trial, the investigators will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of this approach (implementation outcomes) and preliminary effectiveness on methadone treatment retention at three months.
Opioid use disorder (OUD) disproportionately affects low-income, racial/ethnic minorities (Stahler, 2018). MOUD is efficacious for treating OUD. However, adherence to MOUD is often low, which includes poor treatment retention, especially among low-income, racial/ethnic minority individuals (Stahler, 2018;Williams, 2017). This may be due to barriers such as stigma, challenges navigating services, housing instability, fluctuating motivation and readiness, and other structural and psychosocial factors (Timko, 2016;Carroll, 2015). Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) may be uniquely suited to address these barriers to retention (Jack, 2017;Bassuk, 2016). PRSs are trained individuals who have a personal, lived experience with substance use. Using their lived experience, PRSs can support individuals with OUD to stay retained in care. Rapid increases in the use of PRSs nationwide demonstrate the appeal of employing PRSs as a potentially sustainable solution to support the behavioral treatment needs in OUD care. Yet, few evidence-based interventions have been evaluated for PRS delivery to promote MOUD retention. Prior research has been inconclusive regarding psychosocial interventions to support MOUD retention (Timko, 2016; Carroll, 2017). Reinforcement-based approaches, such as contingency management, have empirical support for improving MOUD retention, but also can have low adoption in community settings due to organizational and provider barriers, including cost in medically underserved areas (Timko, 2016; Carroll, 2017; Carroll, 2015). Successful interventions need to be not only effective in improving MOUD retention, but also be feasible and sustainable to deliver for underserved populations. Behavioral activation (BA) may be a feasible, scalable, reinforcement-based approach for improving MOUD retention for low-income, minority individuals with OUD (Magidson, 2011). Originally developed as an efficacious treatment for depression, BA aims to increase positive reinforcement by promoting engagement in adaptive, valued behaviors (Lejuez, 2011). By targeting increases in positive reinforcement, BA has been effective in improving substance use disorder (SUD) treatment retention and preventing future relapse among low-income, minority individuals with SUD. Further, BA has improved medication adherence (i.e., for HIV) among low-income, minority populations with SUD, as well as depression, which may also be a barrier to MOUD retention. Importantly for implementation, BA has previously been implemented in low-resource settings (largely internationally) using lay health workers (e.g., peers, community health workers). However, to date, prior work has yet to evaluate a PRS-delivered BA intervention to support MOUD retention. This study builds upon formative work to adapt and evaluate PRS-delivered BA to support MOUD retention for low-income, minoritized individuals initiating methadone at an outpatient, opioid treatment program in a medically underserved community in Baltimore, Maryland (Magidson, 2011; Magidson, 2018; Satinsky, 2020). The current study has three phases, the first being formative, qualitative work, to adapt the proposed treatment approach. The second phase is a pilot trial (current phase). The pilot trial is an open-label, Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity (implementation outcomes) of a PRS-delivered BA intervention for MOUD retention in methadone treatment, and evaluating retention in the methadone program at three months (primary effectiveness outcome).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
37
The Peer Activate intervention consisted of weekly one-hour BA sessions led by a peer recovery specialist (PRS) for up to 12 weekly sessions, with the first five being the core treatment sessions and content, and the subsequent seven designed to reinforce core content. In these sessions, participants received individualized support in learning skills to assist in their retention and persistence in methadone treatment and were guided through exercises aimed at incorporating substance-free, rewarding activities into their daily life.
University of Maryland Baltimore Drug Treatment Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
University of Maryland, College Park
College Park, Maryland, United States
MOUD Retention Rate: % of Patients Retained at 3 Months
Percent of patients retained in MOUD treatment at three months (i.e. still engaged in care) after intervention enrollment.
Time frame: Measured daily from intake to post-treatment (approximately 12-weeks)
Intervention Feasibility: % of Patients Who Agree to Participate in the Intervention
Feasibility, defined as the suitability and practicability of the approach, was measured quantitatively as the % of patients who agreed to participate in the intervention.
Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-baseline assessment/ post-treatment assessment)
Intervention Acceptability: % of Patients Who Attend ≥75% Sessions
Acceptability, defined as satisfaction with or tolerability of the proposed approach, was measured quantitatively by session attendance. Specifically, we measured the % of patients who attended ≥75% of core intervention sessions.
Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-baseline assessment/ post-treatment assessment)
Intervention Fidelity: Percentage of Intervention Components Delivered by Peer as Intended
Fidelity, defined as the delivery of the intervention as intended, was measured based on PRS adherence to the intervention delivery. A random selection of 20% of sessions was rated for fidelity, and we assessed the % of intervention components delivered as intended.
Time frame: Assessed between the baseline assessment and the acute outcome (approximately 12-weeks post-baseline assessment/ post-treatment assessment)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.