The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a multimodal prehabilitation intervention intended to optimize postoperative recovery in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with soft tissue and bone-based sarcomas of the upper and lower extremities (extremity sarcomas; ES).
Objectives: This objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of multimodal prehabilitation for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with soft tissue and bone-based sarcomas of the upper and lower extremities (extremity sarcomas; ES) and explore its effects on measurements of health-related quality of life, physical function, length of hospital stays, and post-operative complications. Specific aims of the study included: * To determine the feasibility of conducting a larger phase II investigation of HIIT-based multimodal prehabilitation according to three primary criteria, including (i) recruiting \>=50% of otherwise eligible patients (OEP; i.e., patients meeting all eligibility criteria), (ii) no patient experiences a testing-related or an intervention-related serious adverse event (SAE), and (iii) patients achieve an exercise intervention adherence rate of \>=70%. * To further determine the feasibility of conducting a larger phase II investigation of HIIT-based multimodal prehabilitation according to the secondary feasibility criteria. * To explore the preliminary effects of prehabilitation on measures of short-term perioperative outcomes including health-related quality of life, physical function, length of hospital stays, and post-operative complications. Methods: A single-arm, proof-of-concept trial design was informed by the ORBIT model of behavioural treatment development. Mixed methods were employed to obtain relevant context for investigating the feasibility of multimodal prehabilitation in newly diagnosed AYAs with ES within the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants underwent virtual multimodal prehabilitation before undergoing major extremity sarcoma surgery. This program encompassed personalized exercise, nutrition, and stress management support delivered by a registered kinesiologist, registered dietitian, and clinical psychologist, respectively. The interventions were designed to enhance physical and psychological resilience to stress, with the objective of improving recovery outcomes and mitigating the risk of adverse events. Feasibility (e.g., recruitment, safety, tolerability), physical function, and patient-reported outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), immediately preoperatively (T1), and one month postoperatively (T2). Feasibility data and field notes were collected by the research coordinators (during recruitment and postoperative follow-up) and by the study lead / research assistants during the intervention period. A postoperative interview explored experiences with prehabilitation into explore the feasibility and practical considerations of virtual prehabilitation for adolescents and young adults with extremity sarcomas.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
7
Multimodal Prehabilitation * Aerobic exercise * Home-based, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), 2 days/week * Home-based, moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), 2-3 days/week * Resistance exercise * Home-based, moderate-intensity resistance training, 2-3 d/wk, all major muscle groups (working around tumour-related deficits), 8-10 exercises, 12-15 repetitions, resistance bands and body weight based * Nutrition * Protein intake 1.2-1.5 g/kg body weight/day in compliance with European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) guidelines * Stress management * Daily mindfulness practice, 20 min/session, guided by audio file created at Mount Sinai Hospital
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Patient recruitment rate (feasibility target: >=50% of eligible participants)
Defined as the percent of consenting patients based on the total number of otherwise eligible patients (OEP; patients meeting all study eligibility criteria) approached
Time frame: Initiation through end of study recruitment at 12 months
Testing- and intervention-related serious adverse events (feasibility target: none)
Defined as the number and frequency of testing- and intervention-related serious adverse events (SAEs) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Time frame: Initiation through end of pre-operative testing
Patient exercise adherence (feasibility target: >=70% of prescribed)
Defined as relative dose intensity as the percent of total dose of exercise performed relative to the total planned dose prescribed and quantified according to metabolic equivalents
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Patient identification rate (feasibility target: >=50% of OEP)
Defined as the average number of OEP identified each month
Time frame: Initiation through end of study recruitmentat 12 months
Baseline assessment rate (feasibility target: >=90% of consenting participants)
Defined as the percent of consenting patients who successfully complete baseline assessments based on the total number of consenting patients
Time frame: Initiation through end of study recruitment at 12 months
Intervention window (feasibility target: >=21 days)
Defined as the average elapsed time (in days) between diagnosis and extremity sarcoma surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Testing- and intervention-related non-serious adverse events (feasibility target: <20% of sessions)
Defined as the number and frequency of testing- and intervention-related non-serious adverse events (nSAEs) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
Time frame: Initiation through end of pre-operative testing
Testing performance (feasibility target: >=95% completion of tests)
Defined as percent completion physical testing at baseline and follow-up
Time frame: Initiation through end of pre-operative testing
Testing modality adaptations (descriptive)
Defined as the percent of all tests which are adapted for functional or safety reasons
Time frame: Initiation through end of pre-operative testing
Training modality adaptations (descriptive)
Defined as the percent of all exercise sessions which are adapted for functional or safety reasons
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Permanent treatment discontinuation (feasibility target: <=15% of participants)
Defined as the percent of patients who discontinue intervention participation prior to the planned end of the intervention period
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Treatment interruption (feasibility target: <=15% of participants)
Defined as the percent of patients who miss ≥3 consecutive sessions within the intervention period
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Dose modification (feasibility target: <=25% of participants)
Defined as the percent of exercise sessions requiring a dose reduction during training (i.e., intensity or duration) relative to the total number of sessions completed. Total number of exercise sessions with a reduction in intensity or a reduction in duration will be combined into the numerator when calculating the percentage of affected sessions.
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Early session termination (feasibility target: <=25% of participants)
Defined as the percent of exercise sessions requiring unplanned early termination
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Pretreatment intensity modification (feasibility target: <=25% of participants)
Defined as the percent of sessions which required pre-exercise modification of the target exercise intensity due to a pre-exercise screening indication (e.g., fatigue, pain)
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Physical prehabilitation compliance (feasibility target: >=70% of prescribed)
Defined as the percent of exercise sessions completed based on the total number of sessions prescribed
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Mindfulness prehabilitation compliance (feasibility target: >=70% of prescribed)
Defined as the percent of psychological sessions completed based on the total number of sessions prescribed
Time frame: Initiation through end of study intervention period
Attrition (feasibility target: <=20% loss to follow-up)
Defined as the percent loss to follow-up (not completing follow-up assessments), individually and overall
Time frame: Study initiation through end of 1 month postoperative (T2)